Patient Prism LLC
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 5 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2017–2020. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Patient ranks #49,502 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 5 patents across 5 technology areas.
- #49,502
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 19th percentile
- by Innovation Score (26.0/100)
- 19.8
- avg claims per patent
- -75%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R49502 · US Corporation #49,502 · 5 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · BOTTOM-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 5 grants
- BOTTOM-DECILE #49,502/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Passer Stitch
- CPC-NARROW G06F · 5 areas
- INNOV-THIN 26.0/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 19.8 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -75% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Passer Stitch, LLC (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Patient’s 26.0 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Patient
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Patient Prism · this assignee 26
Patient Prism · this assignee
26 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Patient's Innovation Score is 26.0/100 (19th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Patient?
Each dot is one of Patient’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Patient’s own 19.8 claims/patent is ABOVE the 9.0 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Patient's grants concentrate
Patient Prism LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 5 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing). Peak complete grant year is 2019 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2017. By volume, Patient sits between Passer Stitch, LLC and Pay2Day Solutions, Inc..
Who files at Patient's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Passer Stitch
Passer Stitch, LLC
5 patents
- Passion Mobility
Passion Mobility Ltd.
5 patents
- Passport Systems
Passport Systems, Inc.
5 patents
- Pathogen Systems
Pathogen Systems, Inc.
5 patents
- Patio Plants V O F
Patio Plants V.O.F.
5 patents
- Patterson Fan
Patterson Fan Company
5 patents
- Paulus Holdings
Paulus Holdings Limited
5 patents
- Pay2day Solutions
Pay2Day Solutions, Inc.
5 patents
- Patient Prism ◀
Patient Prism LLC
5 patents
What this shows Patient holds 5 patents at rank #49,677, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Patient
By rank, the assignees closest to #49,677 in granted patent volume.
- Passer Stitch, LLC #49,673 · 5 patents
- Passion Mobility Ltd. #49,674 · 5 patents
- Passport Systems, Inc. #49,675 · 5 patents
- Pathogen Systems, Inc. #49,676 · 5 patents
- Patio Plants V.O.F. #49,678 · 5 patents
- Patterson Fan Company #49,679 · 5 patents
- Paulus Holdings Limited #49,680 · 5 patents
- Pay2Day Solutions, Inc. #49,681 · 5 patents
Leaders in G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Patient's primary technology class.
- International Business Machines Corporation 42,717 in class
- Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 21,497 in class
- Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC 16,951 in class
- Google LLC 13,092 in class
- Intel Corporation 12,803 in class
- Apple Inc. 11,007 in class
- Amazon Technologies, Inc. 10,217 in class
- Dell Products L.P. 7,187 in class
Patient's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
26 19th percentile higher than 19% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2017–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2018 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2019 | 2 | 40.0% |
| 2020 | 1 | 20.0% |
Which technologies does Patient Prism LLC patent most?
Top 5 of 5 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Patient Prism LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Patient Prism LLC's lead technology class is G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G06F
- Ranked #49,502 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Patient Prism LLC against Passer Stitch, LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 26.0/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.