USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Pact XPP Technologies AG

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 16 granted patents across 4 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2017. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing).

RSS updates for this company

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Pact ranks #17,982 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 16 patents across 4 technology areas.

#17,982
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
20th percentile
by Innovation Score (26.2/100)
15.6
avg claims per patent
-100%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R17982 · Foreign Corporation #17,982 · 16 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

  • GRANTS-MICRO 16 grants
  • MID-PACK #17,982/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Ora Metrix
  • CPC-NARROW G06F · 4 areas
  • INNOV-THIN 26.2/100
  • CLAIMS-RICH 15.6 claims/avg
  • TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
  • VEL-DROP -100% vel
  • BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Ora Metrix, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Pact’s 26.2 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around Pact

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows Pact's Innovation Score is 26.2/100 (20th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Pact?

Each dot is one of Pact’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Pact’s own 15.6 claims/patent is ABOVE the 13.1 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Pact vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 15.915.91616.1 010203040 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Ora Metrix, Inc. - 16, 11.88Ora MetrixOrison, Inc. - 16, 16.44OrisonOulun yliopisto - 16, 14.81Oulun yliopistoOvonic Battery Company, Inc. - 16, 13.06Ovonic BatteryPAO Shen Enterprises Co., Ltd. - 16, 7.31PAO Shen Enterpri…Peacock Apparel Group, Inc. - 16, 2.81Peacock Apparel G…Perseus Proteomics Inc. - 16, 14.62Perseus ProteomicsPGI Drug Discovery LLC - 16, 35.25PGI Drug DiscoveryPact XPP Technologies AG - 16, 15.62Pact XPP
Pact vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Pact's grants concentrate

Pact XPP Technologies AG is a focused PatentsView assignee: 4 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (6 grants) versus a trough of 4 in 2017. By volume, Pact sits between Ora Metrix, Inc. and PGI Drug Discovery LLC.

Who files at Pact's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Pact holds 16 patents at rank #17,978, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Pact

By rank, the assignees closest to #17,978 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Pact's primary technology class.

Pact's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

26 20th percentile higher than 20% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

3.544.555.566.5 201520162017 4
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2017

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Pact XPP Technologies AG patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2015 6 37.5%
2016 6 37.5%
2017 4 25.0%

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

What to do with this data

Pact XPP Technologies AG's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • Pact XPP Technologies AG's lead technology class is G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G06F
  • Ranked #17,982 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare Pact XPP Technologies AG against Ora Metrix, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 26.2/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.