OWL Autonomous Imaging, Inc.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 7 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2020–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H04N (Pictorial Communication, e.g. Television).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, OWL ranks #49,424 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 5 patents across 7 technology areas.
- #49,424
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- Top 17%
- by Innovation Score (48.1/100)
- 21.0
- avg claims per patent
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R49424 · US Corporation #49,424 · 5 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · BOTTOM-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-USCORP · SPAN-YRS · BOOK-RICH
- GRANTS-MICRO 5 grants
- BOTTOM-DECILE #49,424/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Outstar Office…
- CPC-NARROW H04N · 7 areas
- INNOV-PAR 48.1/100
- CLAIMS-DENSE 21.0 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- SPAN-YRS 2020–2024 · 5y
- BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Outstar Office Furniture Co., Ltd (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How OWL’s 48.1 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around OWL
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- OWL Autonomous Imaging · this assignee
OWL Autonomous Imaging · this assignee
48 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows OWL's Innovation Score is 48.1/100 (top 17% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for OWL?
Each dot is one of OWL’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). OWL’s own 21.0 claims/patent is ABOVE the 8.2 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where OWL's grants concentrate
OWL Autonomous Imaging, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 7 CPC subclasses with 80% of grants classified under H04N (Pictorial Communication, e.g. Television). Peak complete grant year is 2024 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2020. By volume, OWL sits between Outstar Office Furniture Co., Ltd and OYO Toys, Inc..
OWL's three-year grant acceleration
OWL Autonomous Imaging, Inc. shows 4 grants in 2022–2024 against only 1 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at OWL's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Outstar Office Fu…
Outstar Office Furniture Co., Ltd
5 patents
- OVO Joint Venture
OVO Joint Venture LLC
5 patents
- Ovuud
Ovuud, LLC
5 patents
- Owen-barry Pharma…
Owen-barry Pharmaceuticals Inc.
5 patents
- Oxford Immune Alg…
Oxford Immune Algorithmics Ltd
5 patents
- OY Ajat
OY Ajat Ltd.
5 patents
- Oyagen
Oyagen, Inc.
5 patents
- OYO Toys
OYO Toys, Inc.
5 patents
- OWL Autonomous Im… ◀
OWL Autonomous Imaging, Inc.
5 patents
What this shows OWL holds 5 patents at rank #49,332, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near OWL
By rank, the assignees closest to #49,332 in granted patent volume.
- Outstar Office Furniture Co., Ltd #49,328 · 5 patents
- OVO Joint Venture LLC #49,329 · 5 patents
- Ovuud, LLC #49,330 · 5 patents
- Owen-barry Pharmaceuticals Inc. #49,331 · 5 patents
- Oxford Immune Algorithmics Ltd #49,333 · 5 patents
- OY Ajat Ltd. #49,334 · 5 patents
- Oyagen, Inc. #49,335 · 5 patents
- OYO Toys, Inc. #49,336 · 5 patents
Leaders in H04N (Pictorial Communication)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in OWL's primary technology class.
OWL's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
48 Top 17% higher than 83% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2020–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2022 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2023 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2024 | 2 | 40.0% |
Which technologies does OWL Autonomous Imaging, Inc. patent most?
Top 7 of 7 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
OWL Autonomous Imaging, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- OWL Autonomous Imaging, Inc.'s lead technology class is H04N (Pictorial Communication, e.g. Television), 80% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H04N
- Ranked #49,424 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare OWL Autonomous Imaging, Inc. against Outstar Office Furniture Co., Ltd, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 48.1/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.