Otto Ooms B.V.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 5 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2018. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B66B (ELEVATORS; Escalators OR Moving Walkways).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Otto ranks #42,196 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 6 patents across 5 technology areas.
- #42,196
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 7th percentile
- by Innovation Score (20.2/100)
- 9.3
- avg claims per patent
- -100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R42196 · Foreign Corporation #42,196 · 6 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-PAR · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 6 grants
- LOWER-Q #42,196/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Ossvis
- CPC-NARROW B66B · 5 areas
- INNOV-THIN 20.2/100
- CLAIMS-PAR 9.3 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-DROP -100% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Ossvis Co., Ltd. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Otto’s 20.2 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Otto
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Otto Ooms B V · this assignee 20
Otto Ooms B V · this assignee
20 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Otto's Innovation Score is 20.2/100 (7th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Otto?
Each dot is one of Otto’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Otto’s own 9.3 claims/patent is at or below the 13.2 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Otto's grants concentrate
Otto Ooms B.V. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 5 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under B66B (ELEVATORS; Escalators OR Moving Walkways). Peak complete grant year is 2017 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2016. By volume, Otto sits between Ossvis Co., Ltd. and Oxygen Cloud, Inc..
Who files at Otto's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Ossvis
Ossvis Co., Ltd.
6 patents
- Ostara Biomedical
Ostara Biomedical Ltd.
6 patents
- Osteal Therapeuti…
Osteal Therapeutics, Inc.
6 patents
- Otto
Otto LLC
6 patents
- Outlander
Outlander LLC
6 patents
- Oxen
Oxen, Inc.
6 patents
- Oxycom Beheer B V
Oxycom Beheer B.V.
6 patents
- Oxygen Cloud
Oxygen Cloud, Inc.
6 patents
- Otto Ooms B V ◀
Otto Ooms B.V.
6 patents
What this shows Otto holds 6 patents at rank #42,176, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Otto
By rank, the assignees closest to #42,176 in granted patent volume.
Leaders in B66B (Elevators)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Otto's primary technology class.
- Otis Elevator Company 1,225 in class
- Kone Corporation 590 in class
- Inventio AG 475 in class
- thyssenkrupp Elevator Corporation 75 in class
- thyssenkrupp AG 39 in class
- TK Elevator Innovation and Operations GmbH 32 in class
- China University of Mining and Technology 31 in class
- Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories, Inc. 26 in class
Otto's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
20 7th percentile higher than 7% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2017 | 3 | 50.0% |
| 2018 | 2 | 33.3% |
Which technologies does Otto Ooms B.V. patent most?
Top 5 of 5 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Otto Ooms B.V.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Otto Ooms B.V.'s lead technology class is B66B (ELEVATORS; Escalators OR Moving Walkways), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore B66B
- Ranked #42,196 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Otto Ooms B.V. against Ossvis Co., Ltd., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 20.2/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.