Oshikiri Machinery Ltd.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 7 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2020. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B65G (Transport OR Storage Devices, e.g. Conveyors FOR Loading OR Tipping, Shop Conveyor Systems OR Pneumatic Tube Conveyors).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Oshikiri ranks #42,185 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 6 patents across 7 technology areas.
- #42,185
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 13th percentile
- by Innovation Score (24.0/100)
- 13.2
- avg claims per patent
- -80%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R42185 · Foreign Corporation #42,185 · 6 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 6 grants
- LOWER-Q #42,185/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH ORock
- CPC-NARROW B65G · 7 areas
- INNOV-THIN 24.0/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 13.2 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-DROP -80% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: ORock Technologies, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Oshikiri’s 24.0 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Oshikiri
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Oshikiri Machinery · this assignee 24
Oshikiri Machinery · this assignee
24 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Oshikiri's Innovation Score is 24.0/100 (13th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Oshikiri?
Each dot is one of Oshikiri’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Oshikiri’s own 13.2 claims/patent is at or below the 16.3 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Oshikiri's grants concentrate
Oshikiri Machinery Ltd. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 7 CPC subclasses with 50% of grants classified under B65G (Transport OR Storage Devices, e.g. Conveyors FOR Loading OR Tipping, Shop Conveyor Systems OR Pneumatic Tube Conveyors). Peak complete grant year is 2017 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, Oshikiri sits between Ortho-nutra, LLC and Otto MÄNNER GMBH.
Who files at Oshikiri's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Ortho-nutra
Ortho-nutra, LLC
6 patents
- Orock
ORock Technologies, Inc.
6 patents
- Ortelligence
ORtelligence, LLC
6 patents
- Osborn
Osborn, LLC
6 patents
- Osim International
Osim International Ltd.
6 patents
- OSS Suppressors
OSS Suppressors LLC
6 patents
- OTT Hydromet B V
OTT HydroMet B.V.
6 patents
- Otto MÄNNER
Otto MÄNNER GMBH
6 patents
- Oshikiri Machinery ◀
Oshikiri Machinery Ltd.
6 patents
What this shows Oshikiri holds 6 patents at rank #42,101, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Oshikiri
By rank, the assignees closest to #42,101 in granted patent volume.
- Ortho-nutra, LLC #42,097 · 6 patents
- ORock Technologies, Inc. #42,098 · 6 patents
- ORtelligence, LLC #42,099 · 6 patents
- Osborn, LLC #42,100 · 6 patents
- Osim International Ltd. #42,102 · 6 patents
- OSS Suppressors LLC #42,103 · 6 patents
- OTT HydroMet B.V. #42,104 · 6 patents
- Otto MÄNNER GMBH #42,105 · 6 patents
Leaders in B65G (Transport OR Storage Devices)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Oshikiri's primary technology class.
Oshikiri's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
24 13th percentile higher than 13% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2016 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2017 | 3 | 50.0% |
| 2020 | 1 | 16.7% |
Which technologies does Oshikiri Machinery Ltd. patent most?
Top 7 of 7 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Oshikiri Machinery Ltd.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Oshikiri Machinery Ltd.'s lead technology class is B65G (Transport OR Storage Devices, e.g. Conveyors FOR Loading OR Tipping, Shop Conveyor Systems OR Pneumatic Tube Conveyors), 50% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore B65G
- Ranked #42,185 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Oshikiri Machinery Ltd. against Ortho-nutra, LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 24.0/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.