Orthopro LLC
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 1 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2019. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Orthopro ranks #49,388 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 5 patents across 1 technology areas.
- #49,388
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 6th percentile
- by Innovation Score (19.4/100)
- 16.2
- avg claims per patent
- -100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R49388 · US Corporation #49,388 · 5 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · BOTTOM-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-LOW · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 5 grants
- BOTTOM-DECILE #49,388/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Ortery
- CPC-NARROW A61B · 1 areas
- INNOV-LOW 19.4/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 16.2 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -100% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Ortery Technologies, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Orthopro’s 19.4 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Orthopro
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Orthopro · this assignee 19
Orthopro · this assignee
19 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Orthopro's Innovation Score is 19.4/100 (6th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Orthopro?
Each dot is one of Orthopro’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Orthopro’s own 16.2 claims/patent is ABOVE the 15.4 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Orthopro's grants concentrate
Orthopro LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 1 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification). Peak complete grant year is 2018 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, Orthopro sits between Ortery Technologies, Inc. and Ossic Corp..
Who files at Orthopro's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Ortery
Ortery Technologies, Inc.
5 patents
- Ortho AI
Ortho AI LLC
5 patents
- Orthoscan
OrthoScan, Inc.
5 patents
- Orthocision
Orthocision Inc.
5 patents
- Orthotaxy S
Orthotaxy S.A.S.
5 patents
- Osense Technology
Osense Technology Co., Ltd.
5 patents
- Osler Diagnostics
Osler Diagnostics Limited
5 patents
- Ossic
Ossic Corp.
5 patents
- Orthopro ◀
Orthopro LLC
5 patents
What this shows Orthopro holds 5 patents at rank #49,419, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Orthopro
By rank, the assignees closest to #49,419 in granted patent volume.
- Ortery Technologies, Inc. #49,415 · 5 patents
- Ortho AI LLC #49,416 · 5 patents
- OrthoScan, Inc. #49,417 · 5 patents
- Orthocision Inc. #49,418 · 5 patents
- Orthotaxy S.A.S. #49,420 · 5 patents
- Osense Technology Co., Ltd. #49,421 · 5 patents
- Osler Diagnostics Limited #49,422 · 5 patents
- Ossic Corp. #49,423 · 5 patents
Leaders in A61B (Diagnosis)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Orthopro's primary technology class.
- Covidien LP 5,709 in class
- Koniniklijke Philips N.V. 3,414 in class
- Olympus Corporation 2,758 in class
- Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc. 2,362 in class
- Cilag GmbH International 2,063 in class
- Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. 1,921 in class
- DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. 1,796 in class
- Ethicon, Inc. 1,762 in class
Orthopro's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
19 6th percentile higher than 6% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2017 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2018 | 2 | 40.0% |
| 2019 | 1 | 20.0% |
Which technologies does Orthopro LLC patent most?
Top 1 of 1 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Orthopro LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Orthopro LLC's lead technology class is A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A61B
- Ranked #49,388 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Orthopro LLC against Ortery Technologies, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 19.4/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.