Oralabs, Inc.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 7 granted patents across 2 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2017–2020. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A45D (Hairdressing OR Shaving Equipment ; Equipment FOR Cosmetics OR Cosmetic Treatments, e.g. FOR Manicuring OR Pedicuring).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Oralabs ranks #36,835 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 7 patents across 2 technology areas.
- #36,835
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 3rd percentile
- by Innovation Score (14.3/100)
- 3.6
- avg claims per patent
- -60%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R36835 · US Corporation #36,835 · 7 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-LOW · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 7 grants
- MID-PACK #36,835/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Optomec
- CPC-NARROW A45D · 2 areas
- INNOV-LOW 14.3/100
- CLAIMS-SPARSE 3.6 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -60% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Optomec, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Oralabs’s 14.3 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Oralabs
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Oralabs · this assignee 14
Oralabs · this assignee
14 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Oralabs's Innovation Score is 14.3/100 (3rd percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Oralabs?
Each dot is one of Oralabs’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Oralabs’s own 3.6 claims/patent is at or below the 17.6 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Oralabs's grants concentrate
Oralabs, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 2 CPC subclasses with 28.6% of grants classified under A45D (Hairdressing OR Shaving Equipment ; Equipment FOR Cosmetics OR Cosmetic Treatments, e.g. FOR Manicuring OR Pedicuring). Peak complete grant year is 2017 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2019. By volume, Oralabs sits between Optomec, Inc. and Orfit Industries N.V..
Who files at Oralabs's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Optomec
Optomec, Inc.
7 patents
- Optotune Consumer
Optotune Consumer AG
7 patents
- Opus Inspection
Opus Inspection, Inc.
7 patents
- Oqab Dietrich Ind…
Oqab Dietrich Induction Inc.
7 patents
- Orange Biomed
Orange Biomed Co., Ltd
7 patents
- Orbit Fab
Orbit Fab, Inc.
7 patents
- Orchid Sound
Orchid Sound Technologies, LLC
7 patents
- Orfit Industries
Orfit Industries N.V.
7 patents
- Oralabs ◀
Oralabs, Inc.
7 patents
What this shows Oralabs holds 7 patents at rank #36,842, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Oralabs
By rank, the assignees closest to #36,842 in granted patent volume.
- Optomec, Inc. #36,838 · 7 patents
- Optotune Consumer AG #36,839 · 7 patents
- Opus Inspection, Inc. #36,840 · 7 patents
- Oqab Dietrich Induction Inc. #36,841 · 7 patents
- Orange Biomed Co., Ltd #36,843 · 7 patents
- Orbit Fab, Inc. #36,844 · 7 patents
- Orchid Sound Technologies, LLC #36,845 · 7 patents
- Orfit Industries N.V. #36,846 · 7 patents
Leaders in A45D (Hairdressing OR Shaving Equipment)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Oralabs's primary technology class.
Oralabs's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
14 3rd percentile higher than 3% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2017–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 2 | 28.6% |
| 2018 | 2 | 28.6% |
| 2019 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2020 | 2 | 28.6% |
Which technologies does Oralabs, Inc. patent most?
Top 2 of 2 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Oralabs, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Oralabs, Inc.'s lead technology class is A45D (Hairdressing OR Shaving Equipment ; Equipment FOR Cosmetics OR Cosmetic Treatments, e.g. FOR Manicuring OR Pedicuring), 28.6% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A45D
- Ranked #36,835 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Oralabs, Inc. against Optomec, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 14.3/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.