Optimum Imaging Technologies LLC
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 3 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2020–2023. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G02B (Optical Elements, Systems OR Apparatus).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Optimum ranks #49,348 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 5 patents across 3 technology areas.
- #49,348
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 29th percentile
- by Innovation Score (29.0/100)
- 28.0
- avg claims per patent
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R49348 · US Corporation #49,348 · 5 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · BOTTOM-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-USCORP · SPAN-YRS · BOOK-RICH
- GRANTS-MICRO 5 grants
- BOTTOM-DECILE #49,348/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Optic
- CPC-NARROW G02B · 3 areas
- INNOV-THIN 29.0/100
- CLAIMS-DENSE 28.0 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- SPAN-YRS 2020–2023 · 4y
- BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Optic, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Optimum’s 29.0 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Optimum
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Optimum Imaging · this assignee 29
Optimum Imaging · this assignee
29 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Optimum's Innovation Score is 29.0/100 (29th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Optimum?
Each dot is one of Optimum’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Optimum’s own 28.0 claims/patent is ABOVE the 17.6 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Optimum's grants concentrate
Optimum Imaging Technologies LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 3 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under G02B (Optical Elements, Systems OR Apparatus). Peak complete grant year is 2020 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2021. By volume, Optimum sits between Optic, Inc. and Opus Genetics, Inc..
Optimum's three-year grant acceleration
Optimum Imaging Technologies LLC shows 1 grants in 2022–2024 against only 4 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at Optimum's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Optic
Optic, Inc.
5 patents
- Optical Biosystems
Optical Biosystems, Inc.
5 patents
- Opticallock
OpticalLock, Inc.
5 patents
- Optimdosing
OptimDosing, LLC
5 patents
- Optitune Oy
Optitune Oy
5 patents
- Optosecurity
Optosecurity Inc.
5 patents
- Opus Deli
Opus Deli, Inc.
5 patents
- Opus Genetics
Opus Genetics, Inc.
5 patents
- Optimum Imaging ◀
Optimum Imaging Technologies LLC
5 patents
What this shows Optimum holds 5 patents at rank #49,399, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Optimum
By rank, the assignees closest to #49,399 in granted patent volume.
Leaders in G02B (Optical Elements)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Optimum's primary technology class.
- Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 4,608 in class
- Canon Kabushiki Kaisha 2,525 in class
- Fujifilm Corporation 2,173 in class
- BOE Technology Group Co., Ltd. 1,899 in class
- Olympus Corporation 1,893 in class
- Sony Group Corporation 1,572 in class
- Apple Inc. 1,367 in class
- Seiko Epson Corporation 1,332 in class
Optimum's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
29 29th percentile higher than 29% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2020–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 3 | 60.0% |
| 2021 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2023 | 1 | 20.0% |
Which technologies does Optimum Imaging Technologies LLC patent most?
Top 3 of 3 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Optimum Imaging Technologies LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Optimum Imaging Technologies LLC's lead technology class is G02B (Optical Elements, Systems OR Apparatus), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G02B
- Ranked #49,348 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Optimum Imaging Technologies LLC against Optic, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 29.0/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.