Opera Software AS
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 13 granted patents across 5 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2018. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Opera ranks #21,557 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 13 patents across 5 technology areas.
- #21,557
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 24th percentile
- by Innovation Score (27.6/100)
- 17.7
- avg claims per patent
- -100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R21557 · Foreign Corporation #21,557 · 13 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 13 grants
- MID-PACK #21,557/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Omega Optics
- CPC-NARROW G06F · 5 areas
- INNOV-THIN 27.6/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 17.7 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-DROP -100% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Omega Optics, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Opera’s 27.6 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Opera
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Opera Software AS · this assignee 28
Opera Software AS · this assignee
28 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Opera's Innovation Score is 27.6/100 (24th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Opera?
Each dot is one of Opera’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Opera’s own 17.7 claims/patent is ABOVE the 17.3 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Opera's grants concentrate
Opera Software AS is a focused PatentsView assignee: 5 CPC subclasses with 84.6% of grants classified under G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (7 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2017. By volume, Opera sits between Omega Optics, Inc. and Optum360, LLC.
Who files at Opera's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Omega Optics
Omega Optics, Inc.
13 patents
- Omnova Solutions
Omnova Solutions, Inc.
13 patents
- Onicon Incorporat…
Onicon Incorporated
13 patents
- Openexchange
OpenExchange, Inc.
13 patents
- Opsens
Opsens, Inc.
13 patents
- Opterus Research…
Opterus Research and Development, Inc.
13 patents
- Optrel Holding
Optrel Holding AG
13 patents
- Optum360
Optum360, LLC
13 patents
- Opera Software AS ◀
Opera Software AS
13 patents
What this shows Opera holds 13 patents at rank #21,562, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Opera
By rank, the assignees closest to #21,562 in granted patent volume.
- Omega Optics, Inc. #21,558 · 13 patents
- Omnova Solutions, Inc. #21,559 · 13 patents
- Onicon Incorporated #21,560 · 13 patents
- OpenExchange, Inc. #21,561 · 13 patents
- Opsens, Inc. #21,563 · 13 patents
- Opterus Research and Development, Inc. #21,564 · 13 patents
- Optrel Holding AG #21,565 · 13 patents
- Optum360, LLC #21,566 · 13 patents
Leaders in G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Opera's primary technology class.
- International Business Machines Corporation 42,717 in class
- Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 21,497 in class
- Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC 16,951 in class
- Google LLC 13,092 in class
- Intel Corporation 12,803 in class
- Apple Inc. 11,007 in class
- Amazon Technologies, Inc. 10,217 in class
- Dell Products L.P. 7,187 in class
Opera's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
28 24th percentile higher than 24% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 7 | 53.8% |
| 2016 | 3 | 23.1% |
| 2017 | 1 | 7.7% |
| 2018 | 2 | 15.4% |
Which technologies does Opera Software AS patent most?
Top 5 of 5 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Opera Software AS's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Opera Software AS's lead technology class is G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing), 84.6% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G06F
- Ranked #21,557 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Opera Software AS against Omega Optics, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 27.6/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.