OnMobile Global Limited
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 7 granted patents across 7 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2019. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H04M (Telephonic Communication).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Onmobile ranks #36,807 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 7 patents across 7 technology areas.
- #36,807
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 21st percentile
- by Innovation Score (26.6/100)
- 16.7
- avg claims per patent
- -100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R36807 · Foreign Corporation #36,807 · 7 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 7 grants
- MID-PACK #36,807/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Olson Kundig
- CPC-NARROW H04M · 7 areas
- INNOV-THIN 26.6/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 16.7 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-DROP -100% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Olson Kundig, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Onmobile’s 26.6 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Onmobile
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- OnMobile Global · this assignee 27
OnMobile Global · this assignee
27 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Onmobile's Innovation Score is 26.6/100 (21st percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Onmobile?
Each dot is one of Onmobile’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Onmobile’s own 16.7 claims/patent is at or below the 17.0 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Onmobile's grants concentrate
OnMobile Global Limited is a focused PatentsView assignee: 7 CPC subclasses with 85.7% of grants classified under H04M (Telephonic Communication). Peak complete grant year is 2018 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, Onmobile sits between Olson Kundig, Inc. and OneSubsea LLC.
Who files at OnMobile's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Olson Kundig
Olson Kundig, Inc.
7 patents
- Olympus NDT Canada
Olympus NDT Canada Inc.
7 patents
- Omnispeech
OmniSpeech LLC
7 patents
- Onkure
OnKure, Inc.
7 patents
- Oncodesign
Oncodesign SA
7 patents
- One Energy Enterp…
One Energy Enterprises Inc.
7 patents
- One Sciences
One Sciences, Inc.
7 patents
- Onesubsea
OneSubsea LLC
7 patents
- Onmobile Global ◀
OnMobile Global Limited
7 patents
What this shows OnMobile holds 7 patents at rank #36,821, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near OnMobile
By rank, the assignees closest to #36,821 in granted patent volume.
- Olson Kundig, Inc. #36,817 · 7 patents
- Olympus NDT Canada Inc. #36,818 · 7 patents
- OmniSpeech LLC #36,819 · 7 patents
- OnKure, Inc. #36,820 · 7 patents
- Oncodesign SA #36,822 · 7 patents
- One Energy Enterprises Inc. #36,823 · 7 patents
- One Sciences, Inc. #36,824 · 7 patents
- OneSubsea LLC #36,825 · 7 patents
Leaders in H04M (Telephonic Communication)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in OnMobile's primary technology class.
- Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 4,133 in class
- Apple Inc. 2,103 in class
- LG Electronics Inc. 1,342 in class
- Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. 1,077 in class
- International Business Machines Corporation 999 in class
- Google LLC 969 in class
- AT&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. 952 in class
- Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC 904 in class
Onmobile's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
27 21st percentile higher than 21% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2016 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2017 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2018 | 2 | 28.6% |
| 2019 | 2 | 28.6% |
Which technologies does OnMobile Global Limited patent most?
Top 7 of 7 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
OnMobile Global Limited's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- OnMobile Global Limited's lead technology class is H04M (Telephonic Communication), 85.7% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H04M
- Ranked #36,807 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare OnMobile Global Limited against Olson Kundig, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 26.6/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.