Where does One Hour Translation, Ltd. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), One Hour Translation, Ltd. ranks #49,311 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does One Hour Translation, Ltd. hold?

One Hour Translation, Ltd. holds 5 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2019, spanning 3 technology areas.

What is One Hour Translation, Ltd.'s Innovation Score?

One Hour Translation, Ltd. has an Innovation Score of 23.8 out of 100 (13th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does One Hour Translation, Ltd. focus on?

One Hour Translation, Ltd.'s top technology area is G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing) with 4 patents, ranking #7,209 of 13,878 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 3 CPC subclasses total.

Is One Hour Translation, Ltd.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

One Hour Translation, Ltd.'s recent grant velocity is -100% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for One Hour Translation, Ltd.'s patents?

One Hour Translation, Ltd.'s patents average 19.2 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the One Hour Translation, Ltd. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

One Hour Translation, Ltd.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 3 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2019. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, One ranks #49,311 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 5 patents across 3 technology areas.

#49,311
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 13th percentile
by Innovation Score (23.8/100): 19.2
avg claims per patent: -100%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R49311 · Foreign Corporation #49,311 · 5 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · BOTTOM-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 5 grants
BOTTOM-DECILE #49,311/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Onboard Dynamics
CPC-NARROW G06F · 3 areas
INNOV-THIN 23.8/100
CLAIMS-RICH 19.2 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
VEL-DROP -100% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Onboard Dynamics LLC (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How One’s 23.8 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 6.2 pts (26%) Velocity 0.0 pts (0%) Breadth 6.1 pts (26%) Claim depth 11.5 pts (48%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
One Hour Translation · this assignee

24
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows One's Innovation Score is 23.8/100 (13th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for One?

Each dot is one of One’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). One’s own 19.2 claims/patent is ABOVE the 15.0 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

One vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where One's grants concentrate

One Hour Translation, Ltd. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 3 CPC subclasses with 80% of grants classified under G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing). Peak complete grant year is 2017 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, One sits between Onboard Dynamics LLC and Ontos Equipment Systems, Inc..

Onboard Dynamics

5
Oncoc4

5
Oncorus

5
Ondosis AB

5
One Stop Mailing

5
One Way Plastics…

5
Ontex Bvba

5
Ontos Equipment S…

5
One Hour Translat… ◀

5

What this shows One holds 5 patents at rank #49,379, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near One

By rank, the assignees closest to #49,379 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in One's primary technology class.

One's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

24 13th percentile higher than 13% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2019

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

One Hour Translation, Ltd. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	1	20.0%
2016	1	20.0%
2017	2	40.0%
2019	1	20.0%

Which technologies does One Hour Translation, Ltd. patent most?

G06F - Electric Digital Data Processing 4

G10L - Speech Analysis Techniques OR Speech SYNTHESIS; Speech RECOGNITION; Speech OR Voice Processing TECHNIQUES; Speech OR Audio Coding OR Decoding 3

G06Q - Information AND Communication Technology [ICT] Specially Adapted FOR Administrative, Commercial, Financial, Managerial OR Supervisory PURPOSES; Systems OR Methods Specially Adapted FOR Administrative, Commercial, Financial, Managerial OR Supervisory Purposes, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 2

Top 3 of 3 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

One Hour Translation, Ltd.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

One Hour Translation, Ltd.'s lead technology class is G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing), 80% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G06F
Ranked #49,311 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare One Hour Translation, Ltd. against Onboard Dynamics LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 23.8/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.