Where does Omni Cubed, Inc. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Omni Cubed, Inc. ranks #24,941 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Omni Cubed, Inc. hold?

Omni Cubed, Inc. holds 11 US utility patents granted between 2019 and 2025, spanning 8 technology areas.

What is Omni Cubed, Inc.'s Innovation Score?

Omni Cubed, Inc. has an Innovation Score of 30.9 out of 100 (36th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Omni Cubed, Inc. focus on?

Omni Cubed, Inc.'s top technology area is B25B (Tools OR Bench Devices NOT Otherwise Provided FOR, FOR Fastening, Connecting, Disengaging OR Holding) with 3 patents, ranking #170 of 768 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 8 CPC subclasses total.

Is Omni Cubed, Inc.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Omni Cubed, Inc.'s recent grant velocity is +800% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). This indicates accelerating grant output.

What does claim depth mean for Omni Cubed, Inc.'s patents?

Omni Cubed, Inc.'s patents average 9.4 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Omni Cubed, Inc. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Omni Cubed, Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 11 granted patents across 8 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2019–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B25B (Tools OR Bench Devices NOT Otherwise Provided FOR, FOR Fastening, Connecting, Disengaging OR Holding).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Omni ranks #24,941 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 11 patents across 8 technology areas.

#24,941
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 36th percentile
by Innovation Score (30.9/100): 9.4
avg claims per patent: +800%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R24941 · US Corporation #24,941 · 11 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-PAR · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 11 grants
MID-PACK #24,941/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Oeconnection
CPC-NARROW B25B · 8 areas
INNOV-THIN 30.9/100
CLAIMS-PAR 9.4 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-SURGE +800% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Oeconnection LLC (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Omni’s 30.9 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 8.6 pts (28%) Velocity 6.7 pts (22%) Breadth 10.0 pts (32%) Claim depth 5.6 pts (18%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Omni Cubed · this assignee

31
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Omni's Innovation Score is 30.9/100 (36th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Omni?

Each dot is one of Omni’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Omni’s own 9.4 claims/patent is ABOVE the 8.6 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Omni vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Omni's grants concentrate

Omni Cubed, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 8 CPC subclasses with 27.3% of grants classified under B25B (Tools OR Bench Devices NOT Otherwise Provided FOR, FOR Fastening, Connecting, Disengaging OR Holding). Peak complete grant year is 2020 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2019. By volume, Omni sits between Oeconnection LLC and Orasure Technologies, Inc..

Omni's three-year grant acceleration

Omni Cubed, Inc. shows 5 grants in 2022–2024 against only 5 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Oeconnection

11
Oertli-instrumente

11
OFI Testing Equip…

11
Okazaki Manufactu…

11
Omni LPS

11
Onkos Surgical

11
Optomak

11
Orasure

11
Omni Cubed ◀

11

What this shows Omni holds 11 patents at rank #24,916, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Omni

By rank, the assignees closest to #24,916 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in B25B (Tools OR Bench Devices)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Omni's primary technology class.

Omni's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

31 36th percentile higher than 36% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2019–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2019–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Omni Cubed, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2019	1	9.1%
2020	3	27.3%
2021	1	9.1%
2022	2	18.2%
2023	2	18.2%
2024	1	9.1%
2025partial year	1	9.1%

Which technologies does Omni Cubed, Inc. patent most?

B25B - Tools OR Bench Devices NOT Otherwise Provided FOR, FOR Fastening, Connecting, Disengaging OR Holding 3

B62B - Hand-propelled Vehicles, e.g. Hand Carts OR PERAMBULATORS; Sledges 1

F16H - Gearing 1

B60B - Vehicle Wheels ; CASTORS; Axles FOR Wheels OR CASTORS; Increasing Wheel Adhesion 1

F16B - Devices FOR Fastening OR Securing Constructional Elements OR Machine Parts Together, e.g. Nails, Bolts, Circlips, Clamps, Clips OR WEDGES; Joints OR Jointing 1

B66C - CRANES; Load-engaging Elements OR Devices FOR Cranes, Capstans, Winches, OR Tackles 1

B25H - Workshop Equipment, e.g. FOR Marking-out WORK; Storage Means FOR Workshops 1

A47B - TABLES; DESKS; Office FURNITURE; CABINETS; DRAWERS; General Details OF Furniture 1

Top 8 of 8 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Omni Cubed, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Omni Cubed, Inc.'s lead technology class is B25B (Tools OR Bench Devices NOT Otherwise Provided FOR, FOR Fastening, Connecting, Disengaging OR Holding), 27.3% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore B25B
Ranked #24,941 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Omni Cubed, Inc. against Oeconnection LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 30.9/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.