USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Omega SA (Omega AG)(Omega Ltd.)

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 20 granted patents across 0 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength.

RSS updates for this company

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Omega ranks #14,829 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 20 patents across 0 technology areas.

#14,829
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
37th percentile
by Innovation Score (31.1/100)
1.0
avg claims per patent
+700%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R14829 · Foreign Corporation #14,829 · 20 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-UNK · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-RICH

  • GRANTS-SMALL 20 grants
  • MID-PACK #14,829/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Oakland University
  • CPC-UNK CPC blank
  • INNOV-THIN 31.1/100
  • CLAIMS-SPARSE 1.0 claims/avg
  • TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
  • VEL-SURGE +700% vel
  • BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Oakland University (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Omega’s 31.1 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around Omega

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows Omega's Innovation Score is 31.1/100 (37th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Omega?

Each dot is one of Omega’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Omega’s own 1.0 claims/patent is at or below the 12.7 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Omega vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 19.919.92020.1 0102030 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Overland Storage, Inc. - 20, 11.3Overland StorageOakland University - 20, 18.05Oakland UniversityOcera Therapeutics, Inc. - 20, 14.55Ocera TherapeuticsOlin Corporation - 20, 10.9OlinOneida Air Systems, Inc. - 20, 7.4Oneida Air SystemsOptovate Limited - 20, 25.3OptovateOstomyCure AS - 20, 12.65Ostomycure ASOtoNexus Medical Technologies, Inc. - 20, 23.2Otonexus MedicalOmega SA (Omega AG)(Omega Ltd.) - 20, 1Omega (Omega )(Om…
Omega vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Omega's grants concentrate

Omega SA (Omega AG)(Omega Ltd.) is a focused PatentsView assignee: 0 CPC subclasses . Peak complete grant year is 2024 (6 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, Omega sits between Overland Storage, Inc. and OtoNexus Medical Technologies, Inc..

Omega's three-year grant acceleration

Omega SA (Omega AG)(Omega Ltd.) shows 8 grants in 2022–2024 against only 0 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Who files at Omega's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Omega holds 20 patents at rank #14,830, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Omega

By rank, the assignees closest to #14,830 in granted patent volume.

Omega's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

31 37th percentile higher than 37% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

051015 2015202320242025 11
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Omega SA (Omega AG)(Omega Ltd.) patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2015 1 5.0%
2023 2 10.0%
2024 6 30.0%
2025partial year 11 55.0%

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

What to do with this data

Omega SA (Omega AG)(Omega Ltd.)'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • Ranked #14,829 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare Omega SA (Omega AG)(Omega Ltd.) against Overland Storage, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 31.1/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.