USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Olympus Imaging Corp.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 80 granted patents across 7 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2015. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H04N (Pictorial Communication, e.g. Television).

RSS updates for this company

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Olympus ranks #4,428 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 80 patents across 7 technology areas.

#4,428
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
43rd percentile
by Innovation Score (33.1/100)
14.3
avg claims per patent
-100%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R4428 · Foreign Corporation #4,428 · 80 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · TOP-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

  • GRANTS-SMALL 80 grants
  • TOP-DECILE #4,428/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Nien Made Enterprise
  • CPC-NARROW H04N · 7 areas
  • INNOV-THIN 33.1/100
  • CLAIMS-RICH 14.3 claims/avg
  • TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
  • VEL-DROP -100% vel
  • BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Nien Made Enterprise Co., Ltd. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Olympus’s 33.1 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around Olympus

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows Olympus's Innovation Score is 33.1/100 (43rd percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Olympus?

Each dot is one of Olympus’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Olympus’s own 14.3 claims/patent is ABOVE the 13.3 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Olympus vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 79.980.080.08080.080.080.1 0510152025 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Nihon Plast Co., Ltd. - 80, 5.04Nihon PlastNippon Hoso Kyokai - 80, 7.5Nippon Hoso KyokaiNorma Germany GMBH - 80, 13.2Norma GermanyNien Made Enterprise Co., Ltd. - 80, 13.25Nien Made Enterpr…Pratt Retail Specialties, LLC - 80, 16.98Pratt Retail Spec…Shenzhen BYD Auto R&D Company Limited - 80, 15.71Shenzhen BYD Auto…Sila Nanotechnologies, Inc. - 80, 22.71Sila Nanotechnolo…SK Biopharmaceuticals Co., Ltd. - 80, 15.19SK Biopharmaceuti…Olympus Imaging Corp. - 80, 14.26Olympus Imaging
Olympus vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Olympus's grants concentrate

Olympus Imaging Corp. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 7 CPC subclasses with 70% of grants classified under H04N (Pictorial Communication, e.g. Television). By volume, Olympus sits between Nihon Plast Co., Ltd. and SK Biopharmaceuticals Co., Ltd..

Who files at Olympus's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Olympus holds 80 patents at rank #4,428, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Olympus

By rank, the assignees closest to #4,428 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in H04N (Pictorial Communication)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Olympus's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Olympus, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In H04N (Pictorial Communication), Olympus ranks #324 of 5,951 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Olympus's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

33 43rd percentile higher than 43% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

What to do with this data

Olympus Imaging Corp.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • Olympus Imaging Corp.'s lead technology class is H04N (Pictorial Communication, e.g. Television), 70% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H04N
  • Ranked #4,428 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare Olympus Imaging Corp. against Nihon Plast Co., Ltd., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 33.1/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.