Olink Proteomics AB
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 2 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2017–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G01N (Investigating OR Analysing Materials BY Determining Their Chemical OR Physical Properties).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Olink ranks #42,098 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 6 patents across 2 technology areas.
- #42,098
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 21st percentile
- by Innovation Score (26.7/100)
- 29.7
- avg claims per patent
- -33%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R42098 · Foreign Corporation #42,098 · 6 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DOWN · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 6 grants
- LOWER-Q #42,098/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Ojo Labs
- CPC-NARROW G01N · 2 areas
- INNOV-THIN 26.7/100
- CLAIMS-DENSE 29.7 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-DOWN -33% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Ojo Labs, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Olink’s 26.7 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Olink
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Olink Proteomics AB · this assignee 27
Olink Proteomics AB · this assignee
27 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Olink's Innovation Score is 26.7/100 (21st percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Olink?
Each dot is one of Olink’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Olink’s own 29.7 claims/patent is ABOVE the 17.5 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Olink's grants concentrate
Olink Proteomics AB is a focused PatentsView assignee: 2 CPC subclasses with 83.3% of grants classified under G01N (Investigating OR Analysing Materials BY Determining Their Chemical OR Physical Properties). Peak complete grant year is 2017 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2018. By volume, Olink sits between Ojo Labs, Inc. and One Health Group, Inc..
Who files at Olink's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Ojo Labs
Ojo Labs, Inc.
6 patents
- Oklo
Oklo Inc.
6 patents
- Oktober
Oktober, LLC
6 patents
- Oleg Illiich Epsh…
Oleg Illiich Epshtein
6 patents
- Omnigen Research
OmniGen Research, LLC
6 patents
- Omnicare
Omnicare, LLC
6 patents
- Omron Adept
Omron Adept Technologies, Inc.
6 patents
- One Health Group
One Health Group, Inc.
6 patents
- Olink Proteomics… ◀
Olink Proteomics AB
6 patents
What this shows Olink holds 6 patents at rank #42,129, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Olink
By rank, the assignees closest to #42,129 in granted patent volume.
- Ojo Labs, Inc. #42,125 · 6 patents
- Oklo Inc. #42,126 · 6 patents
- Oktober, LLC #42,127 · 6 patents
- Oleg Illiich Epshtein #42,128 · 6 patents
- OmniGen Research, LLC #42,130 · 6 patents
- Omnicare, LLC #42,131 · 6 patents
- Omron Adept Technologies, Inc. #42,132 · 6 patents
- One Health Group, Inc. #42,133 · 6 patents
Leaders in G01N (Investigating OR Analysing Materials BY Determining Their…)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Olink's primary technology class.
- The Regents of the University of California 1,153 in class
- Shimadzu Corporation 1,111 in class
- Saudi Arabian OIL Company 837 in class
- Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. 816 in class
- The Boeing Company 701 in class
- General Electric Company 634 in class
- Kla-tencor Corporation 583 in class
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology 530 in class
Olink's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
27 21st percentile higher than 21% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2017–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 2 | 33.3% |
| 2018 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2020 | 2 | 33.3% |
| 2025partial year | 1 | 16.7% |
Which technologies does Olink Proteomics AB patent most?
Top 2 of 2 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Olink Proteomics AB's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Olink Proteomics AB's lead technology class is G01N (Investigating OR Analysing Materials BY Determining Their Chemical OR Physical Properties), 83.3% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G01N
- Ranked #42,098 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Olink Proteomics AB against Ojo Labs, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 26.7/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.