Where does Officemate International Corp. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Officemate International Corp. ranks #27,026 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Officemate International Corp. hold?

Officemate International Corp. holds 10 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2018, spanning 3 technology areas.

What is Officemate International Corp.'s Innovation Score?

Officemate International Corp. has an Innovation Score of 16.0 out of 100 (3rd percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

Is Officemate International Corp.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Officemate International Corp.'s recent grant velocity is -100% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for Officemate International Corp.'s patents?

Officemate International Corp.'s patents average 2.6 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Officemate International Corp. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Officemate International Corp.

Q: What technology areas does Officemate International Corp. focus on?

Officemate International Corp.'s top technology area is B26D (CUTTING; Details Common TO Machines FOR Perforating, Punching, Cutting-out, Stamping-out OR Severing) with 1 patents, ranking #297 of 595 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 3 CPC subclasses total.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 10 granted patents across 3 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2018. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B26D (CUTTING; Details Common TO Machines FOR Perforating, Punching, Cutting-out, Stamping-out OR Severing).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Officemate ranks #27,026 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 10 patents across 3 technology areas.

#27,026
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 3rd percentile
by Innovation Score (16.0/100): 2.6
avg claims per patent: -100%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R27026 · US Corporation #27,026 · 10 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-LOW · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 10 grants
MID-PACK #27,026/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Oakwood Laboratories
CPC-NARROW B26D · 3 areas
INNOV-LOW 16.0/100
CLAIMS-SPARSE 2.6 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-DROP -100% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Oakwood Laboratories, LLC (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Officemate’s 16.0 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 8.3 pts (52%) Velocity 0.0 pts (0%) Breadth 6.1 pts (38%) Claim depth 1.6 pts (10%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Officemate Internati… · this assignee

16
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Officemate's Innovation Score is 16.0/100 (3rd percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Officemate?

Each dot is one of Officemate’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Officemate’s own 2.6 claims/patent is at or below the 14.7 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Officemate vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Officemate's grants concentrate

Officemate International Corp. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 3 CPC subclasses with 10% of grants classified under B26D (CUTTING; Details Common TO Machines FOR Perforating, Punching, Cutting-out, Stamping-out OR Severing). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (4 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2017. By volume, Officemate sits between Oakwood Laboratories, LLC and Olive Seed Industries, LLC.

Oakwood Laborator…

10
Ocata Therapeutics

10
Ockerman Automati…

10
Octrolix BV

10
Ohio Associated E…

10
Oilquick Deutschl…

10
Oldcastle Archite…

10
Olive Seed Indust…

10
Officemate Intern… ◀

10

What this shows Officemate holds 10 patents at rank #27,041, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Officemate

By rank, the assignees closest to #27,041 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in B26D (Cutting)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Officemate's primary technology class.

Officemate's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

16 3rd percentile higher than 3% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2018

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Officemate International Corp. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	4	40.0%
2016	3	30.0%
2017	1	10.0%
2018	2	20.0%

Which technologies does Officemate International Corp. patent most?

B26D - CUTTING; Details Common TO Machines FOR Perforating, Punching, Cutting-out, Stamping-out OR Severing 1

Y10T - Technical Subjects Covered BY Former US Classification 1

B26F - PERFORATING; PUNCHING; CUTTING-OUT; STAMPING-OUT; Severing BY Means Other Than Cutting 1

Top 3 of 3 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Officemate International Corp.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Officemate International Corp.'s lead technology class is B26D (CUTTING; Details Common TO Machines FOR Perforating, Punching, Cutting-out, Stamping-out OR Severing), 10% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore B26D
Ranked #27,026 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Officemate International Corp. against Oakwood Laboratories, LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 16.0/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.