Where does OET GmbH rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), OET GmbH ranks #32,719 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does OET GmbH hold?

OET GmbH holds 8 US utility patents granted between 2020 and 2025, spanning 4 technology areas.

What is OET GmbH's Innovation Score?

OET GmbH has an Innovation Score of 29.9 out of 100 (33rd percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

Is OET GmbH's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Insufficient historical data is available to calculate a velocity trend for OET GmbH.

What does claim depth mean for OET GmbH's patents?

OET GmbH's patents average 14.4 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the OET GmbH patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

OET GmbH

Q: What technology areas does OET GmbH focus on?

OET GmbH's top technology area is F04C (Rotary-piston, OR Oscillating-piston, Positive-displacement Machines FOR Liquids ; Rotary-piston, OR Oscillating-piston, Positive-displacement Pumps) with 8 patents, ranking #79 of 587 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 4 CPC subclasses total.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 8 granted patents across 4 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2020–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: F04C (Rotary-piston, OR Oscillating-piston, Positive-displacement Machines FOR Liquids ; Rotary-piston, OR Oscillating-piston, Positive-displacement Pumps).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, OET ranks #32,719 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 8 patents across 4 technology areas.

#32,719
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 33rd percentile
by Innovation Score (29.9/100): 14.4
avg claims per patent

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R32719 · Foreign Corporation #32,719 · 8 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · SPAN-YRS · BOOK-RICH

GRANTS-MICRO 8 grants
MID-PACK #32,719/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Nvidia Technology UK
CPC-NARROW F04C · 4 areas
INNOV-THIN 29.9/100
CLAIMS-RICH 14.4 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
SPAN-YRS 2020–2025 · 6y
BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Nvidia Technology UK Limited (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How OET’s 29.9 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 7.6 pts (25%) Velocity 6.7 pts (22%) Breadth 7.1 pts (24%) Claim depth 8.6 pts (29%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
OET · this assignee

30
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows OET's Innovation Score is 29.9/100 (33rd percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for OET?

Each dot is one of OET’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). OET’s own 14.4 claims/patent is ABOVE the 10.8 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

OET vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where OET's grants concentrate

OET GmbH is a focused PatentsView assignee: 4 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under F04C (Rotary-piston, OR Oscillating-piston, Positive-displacement Machines FOR Liquids ; Rotary-piston, OR Oscillating-piston, Positive-displacement Pumps). Peak complete grant year is 2021 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2020. By volume, OET sits between Nvidia Technology UK Limited and Oilcrops Research Institute OF Chinese Acadamy OF Agriculture Sciences.

OET's three-year grant acceleration

OET GmbH shows 3 grants in 2022–2024 against only 3 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Nvidia Technology…

8
Nyriad

8
OBP Surgical

8
Octo Telematics S…

8
Ognibene Power S…

8
Ohaus Instruments…

8
OIL States Indust…

8
Oilcrops Research…

8
OET ◀

8

What this shows OET holds 8 patents at rank #32,701, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near OET

By rank, the assignees closest to #32,701 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in F04C (Rotary-piston)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in OET's primary technology class.

OET's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

30 33rd percentile higher than 33% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2020–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2020–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

OET GmbH patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2020	1	12.5%
2021	2	25.0%
2022	1	12.5%
2024	2	25.0%
2025partial year	2	25.0%

Which technologies does OET GmbH patent most?

F04C - Rotary-piston, OR Oscillating-piston, Positive-displacement Machines FOR Liquids ; Rotary-piston, OR Oscillating-piston, Positive-displacement Pumps 8

B60H - Arrangements OF Heating, Cooling, Ventilating OR Other Air-treating Devices Specially Adapted FOR Passenger OR Goods Spaces OF Vehicles 2

F04B - Positive-displacement Machines FOR LIQUIDS; Pumps 1

F25B - Refrigeration Machines, Plants OR SYSTEMS; Combined Heating AND Refrigeration SYSTEMS; Heat Pump Systems 1

Top 4 of 4 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

OET GmbH's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

OET GmbH's lead technology class is F04C (Rotary-piston, OR Oscillating-piston, Positive-displacement Machines FOR Liquids ; Rotary-piston, OR Oscillating-piston, Positive-displacement Pumps), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore F04C
Ranked #32,719 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare OET GmbH against Nvidia Technology UK Limited, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 29.9/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.