Overall rank by patents
#42,041
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 4 technology areas, active 2015–2016. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: F04C (ROTARY-PISTON, OR OSCILLATING-PISTON, POSITIVE-DISPLACEMENT MACHINES FOR LIQUIDS ; ROTARY-PISTON, OR OSCILLATING-PISTON, POSITIVE-DISPLACEMENT PUMPS).
The verdict
Oerlikon holds 6 US patents across 4 technology areas, rank #42,041 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
Oerlikon Leybold Vaccum Gmbh has been granted 6 US utility patents between 2015 and 2016, placing Oerlikon Leybold Vaccum Gmbh at rank #42,041 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 4 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 13.3 claims per patent with primary concentration in F04C (ROTARY-PISTON, OR OSCILLATING-PISTON, POSITIVE-DISPLACEMENT MACHINES FOR LIQUIDS ; ROTARY-PISTON, OR OSCILLATING-PISTON, POSITIVE-DISPLACEMENT PUMPS). As a Foreign Corporation, Oerlikon Leybold Vaccum Gmbh is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Oerlikon sits between OAM Photonics Llc (6 patents, rank #42,037) and Ohaus Instruments (shanghai) Co., Ltd. (6 patents, rank #42,045) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 21.8/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 0 grants, compared with 6 in the 2015–2019 window, a -100% shift in five-year velocity. A cooling filing rate may reflect portfolio consolidation, shifting priorities, or reduced R&D throughput. The Foreign Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Oerlikon Leybold Vaccum Gmbh's 13.3 average claims per patent sits within the typical range for solid legal coverage without excessive prosecution cost, while specialization in 4 subclasses reflects a tightly scoped invention area. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Oerlikon Leybold Vaccum Gmbh against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
OAM Photonics LLC
6 patents
OBRIZUM GROUP LTD.
6 patents
OCON MEDICAL LTD.
6 patents
OE Wheel Works, LLC
6 patents
OERLIKON METCO AG
6 patents
OES LIMITED
6 patents
OGD2 PHARMA
6 patents
OHAUS INSTRUMENTS (SHANGHAI) CO., LTD.
6 patents
OERLIKON LEYBOLD VACCUM GMBH
6 patents
What this shows Oerlikon holds 6 patents at rank #42,041, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #42,041 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Oerlikon's primary technology class.
Oerlikon's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
22 Top 91% higher than 9% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 4 | 66.7% |
| 2016 | 2 | 33.3% |
Top 4 of 4 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#42,041
Across all tracked assignees
21.8 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
Oerlikon's 6 grants land it in the top 91% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.