Octoscope Inc.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 7 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2021. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H04B (Transmission).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Octoscope ranks #42,072 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 6 patents across 7 technology areas.
- #42,072
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 36th percentile
- by Innovation Score (31.1/100)
- 27.0
- avg claims per patent
- +0%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R42072 · US Corporation #42,072 · 6 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-FLAT · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 6 grants
- LOWER-Q #42,072/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Oakworks
- CPC-NARROW H04B · 7 areas
- INNOV-THIN 31.1/100
- CLAIMS-DENSE 27.0 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-FLAT +0% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Oakworks, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Octoscope’s 31.1 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Octoscope
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Octoscope · this assignee 31
Octoscope · this assignee
31 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Octoscope's Innovation Score is 31.1/100 (36th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Octoscope?
Each dot is one of Octoscope’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Octoscope’s own 27.0 claims/patent is ABOVE the 17.0 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Octoscope's grants concentrate
Octoscope Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 7 CPC subclasses with 50% of grants classified under H04B (Transmission). Peak complete grant year is 2021 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2018. By volume, Octoscope sits between Oakworks, Inc. and Odyssey Tool, LLC.
Who files at Octoscope's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Oakworks
Oakworks, Inc.
6 patents
- Objectstore
ObjectStore, Inc.
6 patents
- Observe Medical A…
Observe Medical ApS
6 patents
- Ocean Cleaner
Ocean Cleaner, LLC
6 patents
- Oculogica
Oculogica
6 patents
- Odyssey Logistics…
Odyssey Logistics and Technology Corporation
6 patents
- Odyssey Semicondu…
Odyssey Semiconductor, Inc.
6 patents
- Odyssey Tool
Odyssey Tool, LLC
6 patents
- Octoscope ◀
Octoscope Inc.
6 patents
What this shows Octoscope holds 6 patents at rank #42,119, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Octoscope
By rank, the assignees closest to #42,119 in granted patent volume.
- Oakworks, Inc. #42,115 · 6 patents
- ObjectStore, Inc. #42,116 · 6 patents
- Observe Medical ApS #42,117 · 6 patents
- Ocean Cleaner, LLC #42,118 · 6 patents
- Oculogica #42,120 · 6 patents
- Odyssey Logistics and Technology Corporation #42,121 · 6 patents
- Odyssey Semiconductor, Inc. #42,122 · 6 patents
- Odyssey Tool, LLC #42,123 · 6 patents
Leaders in H04B (Transmission)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Octoscope's primary technology class.
- Qualcomm Incorporated 6,670 in class
- Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 4,632 in class
- LG Electronics Inc. 3,654 in class
- Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. 3,555 in class
- Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Publ) 3,146 in class
- Apple Inc. 2,286 in class
- Intel Corporation 1,705 in class
- Sony Group Corporation 1,475 in class
Octoscope's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
31 36th percentile higher than 36% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 2 | 33.3% |
| 2018 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2021 | 3 | 50.0% |
Which technologies does Octoscope Inc. patent most?
Top 7 of 7 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Octoscope Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Octoscope Inc.'s lead technology class is H04B (Transmission), 50% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H04B
- Ranked #42,072 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Octoscope Inc. against Oakworks, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 31.1/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.