Oceana Energy Company
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 7 granted patents across 12 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: F03B (Machines OR Engines FOR Liquids).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Oceana ranks #36,777 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 7 patents across 12 technology areas.
- #36,777
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- Top 41%
- by Innovation Score (38.4/100)
- 20.4
- avg claims per patent
- +0%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R36777 · US Corporation #36,777 · 7 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-FLAT · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 7 grants
- MID-PACK #36,777/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH O2C Raleigh
- CPC-FOCUS F03B · 12 areas
- INNOV-THIN 38.4/100
- CLAIMS-DENSE 20.4 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-FLAT +0% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: O2C Raleigh, LLC (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Oceana’s 38.4 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Oceana
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Oceana Energy · this assignee
Oceana Energy · this assignee
38 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Oceana's Innovation Score is 38.4/100 (top 41% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Oceana?
Each dot is one of Oceana’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Oceana’s own 20.4 claims/patent is ABOVE the 13.3 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Oceana's grants concentrate
Oceana Energy Company is a focused PatentsView assignee: 12 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under F03B (Machines OR Engines FOR Liquids). By volume, Oceana sits between O2C Raleigh, LLC and Oita University.
Oceana's three-year grant acceleration
Oceana Energy Company shows 2 grants in 2022–2024 against only 2 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at Oceana's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- O2C Raleigh
O2C Raleigh, LLC
7 patents
- Oblique Therapeut…
Oblique Therapeutics AB
7 patents
- Observatoire DE P…
Observatoire DE Paris
7 patents
- Obsidian Therapeu…
Obsidian Therapeutics, Inc.
7 patents
- Oceans
Oceans Co., Ltd.
7 patents
- Ofip
Ofip Limited
7 patents
- Oishi Koseido
Oishi Koseido Co., Ltd.
7 patents
- Oita University
Oita University
7 patents
- Oceana Energy ◀
Oceana Energy Company
7 patents
What this shows Oceana holds 7 patents at rank #36,756, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Oceana
By rank, the assignees closest to #36,756 in granted patent volume.
- O2C Raleigh, LLC #36,752 · 7 patents
- Oblique Therapeutics AB #36,753 · 7 patents
- Observatoire DE Paris #36,754 · 7 patents
- Obsidian Therapeutics, Inc. #36,755 · 7 patents
- Oceans Co., Ltd. #36,757 · 7 patents
- Ofip Limited #36,758 · 7 patents
- Oishi Koseido Co., Ltd. #36,759 · 7 patents
- Oita University #36,760 · 7 patents
Leaders in F03B (Machines OR Engines FOR Liquids)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Oceana's primary technology class.
Oceana's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
38 Top 41% higher than 59% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2018 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2019 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2020 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2022 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2024 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2025partial year | 1 | 14.3% |
Which technologies does Oceana Energy Company patent most?
Top 12 of 12 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Oceana Energy Company's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Oceana Energy Company's lead technology class is F03B (Machines OR Engines FOR Liquids), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore F03B
- Ranked #36,777 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Oceana Energy Company against O2C Raleigh, LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 38.4/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.