USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Numerify, Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 17 granted patents across 4 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2020. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing).

RSS updates for this company

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Numerify ranks #17,052 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 17 patents across 4 technology areas.

#17,052
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
24th percentile
by Innovation Score (27.6/100)
17.5
avg claims per patent
-69%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R17052 · US Corporation #17,052 · 17 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

  • GRANTS-MICRO 17 grants
  • MID-PACK #17,052/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Novaflux
  • CPC-NARROW G06F · 4 areas
  • INNOV-THIN 27.6/100
  • CLAIMS-RICH 17.5 claims/avg
  • TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
  • VEL-DROP -69% vel
  • BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Novaflux Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Numerify’s 27.6 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around Numerify

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows Numerify's Innovation Score is 27.6/100 (24th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Numerify?

Each dot is one of Numerify’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Numerify’s own 17.5 claims/patent is ABOVE the 16.5 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Numerify vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 16.916.91717.1 10152025 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Novaflux Inc. - 17, 23.06NovafluxNuMat Technologies, Inc. - 17, 18.24NumatNucleus Scientific Inc. - 17, 19.65Nucleus ScientificNufern - 17, 22.06NufernNuoDB, Inc. - 17, 15.76NuodbObrist Technologies GMBH - 17, 13.47ObristOclaro Technology Limited - 17, 16.47Oclaro TechnologyOcular Therapeutix, Inc. - 17, 15Ocular TherapeutixNumerify, Inc. - 17, 17.53Numerify
Numerify vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Numerify's grants concentrate

Numerify, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 4 CPC subclasses with 88.2% of grants classified under G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing). Peak complete grant year is 2018 (6 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, Numerify sits between Novaflux Inc. and Ocular Therapeutix, Inc..

Who files at Numerify's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Numerify holds 17 patents at rank #17,052, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Numerify

By rank, the assignees closest to #17,052 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Numerify's primary technology class.

Numerify's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

28 24th percentile higher than 24% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

02468 20152017201820192020 4
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2020

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Numerify, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2015 1 5.9%
2017 1 5.9%
2018 6 35.3%
2019 5 29.4%
2020 4 23.5%

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

What to do with this data

Numerify, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • Numerify, Inc.'s lead technology class is G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing), 88.2% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G06F
  • Ranked #17,052 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare Numerify, Inc. against Novaflux Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 27.6/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.