NO Sacrifice Bags Inc.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 14 granted patents across 4 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2023–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A45C (PURSES; LUGGAGE; Hand Carried Bags).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, NO ranks #20,159 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 14 patents across 4 technology areas.
- #20,159
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- Top 35%
- by Innovation Score (40.5/100)
- 6.9
- avg claims per patent
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R20159 · Foreign Corporation #20,159 · 14 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · SPAN-YRS · BOOK-RICH
- GRANTS-MICRO 14 grants
- MID-PACK #20,159/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Nikang Therapeutics
- CPC-NARROW A45C · 4 areas
- INNOV-PAR 40.5/100
- CLAIMS-SPARSE 6.9 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- SPAN-YRS 2023–2025 · 3y
- BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Nikang Therapeutics, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How NO’s 40.5 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around NO
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- NO Sacrifice Bags · this assignee
NO Sacrifice Bags · this assignee
41 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows NO's Innovation Score is 40.5/100 (top 35% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for NO?
Each dot is one of NO’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). NO’s own 6.9 claims/patent is at or below the 14.7 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where NO's grants concentrate
NO Sacrifice Bags Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 4 CPC subclasses with 28.6% of grants classified under A45C (PURSES; LUGGAGE; Hand Carried Bags). Peak complete grant year is 2023 (7 grants) versus a trough of 4 in 2024. By volume, NO sits between Nikang Therapeutics, Inc. and Nota, Inc..
NO's three-year grant acceleration
NO Sacrifice Bags Inc. shows 11 grants in 2022–2024 against only 0 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at NO's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Nikang Therapeuti…
Nikang Therapeutics, Inc.
14 patents
- Ninebot (Changzho…
Ninebot (CHANGZHOU) Tech Co., Ltd.
14 patents
- Ninepoint Medical
Ninepoint Medical, Inc.
14 patents
- Ningbo Lisi House…
Ningbo Lisi Houseware Co., Ltd.
14 patents
- NOD
NOD, Inc.
14 patents
- Nolangroup SPA
Nolangroup SPA
14 patents
- North America I M…
North America I.M.L. Containers Inc.
14 patents
- Nota
Nota, Inc.
14 patents
- NO Sacrifice Bags ◀
NO Sacrifice Bags Inc.
14 patents
What this shows NO holds 14 patents at rank #20,140, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near NO
By rank, the assignees closest to #20,140 in granted patent volume.
- Nikang Therapeutics, Inc. #20,136 · 14 patents
- Ninebot (CHANGZHOU) Tech Co., Ltd. #20,137 · 14 patents
- Ninepoint Medical, Inc. #20,138 · 14 patents
- Ningbo Lisi Houseware Co., Ltd. #20,139 · 14 patents
- NOD, Inc. #20,141 · 14 patents
- Nolangroup SPA #20,142 · 14 patents
- North America I.M.L. Containers Inc. #20,143 · 14 patents
- Nota, Inc. #20,144 · 14 patents
Leaders in A45C (Purses)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in NO's primary technology class.
NO's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
41 Top 35% higher than 65% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2023–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 7 | 50.0% |
| 2024 | 4 | 28.6% |
| 2025partial year | 3 | 21.4% |
Which technologies does NO Sacrifice Bags Inc. patent most?
Top 4 of 4 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
NO Sacrifice Bags Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- NO Sacrifice Bags Inc.'s lead technology class is A45C (PURSES; LUGGAGE; Hand Carried Bags), 28.6% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A45C
- Ranked #20,159 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare NO Sacrifice Bags Inc. against Nikang Therapeutics, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 40.5/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.