Overall rank by patents
#41,994
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 2 technology areas, active 2018–2020. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: G01N (INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES).
The verdict
Nima holds 6 US patents across 2 technology areas, rank #41,994 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
Nima Labs, Inc. has been granted 6 US utility patents between 2018 and 2020, placing Nima Labs, Inc. at rank #41,994 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 2 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 12.5 claims per patent with primary concentration in G01N (INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES). As a US Corporation, Nima Labs, Inc. is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Nima sits between Nienstedt Gmbh (6 patents, rank #41,990) and Ningbo FABE Child Safety Co., Ltd. (6 patents, rank #41,998) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 19.2/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 1 grants, compared with 5 in the 2015–2019 window, a -80% shift in five-year velocity. A cooling filing rate may reflect portfolio consolidation, shifting priorities, or reduced R&D throughput. The US Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Nima Labs, Inc.'s 12.5 average claims per patent sits within the typical range for solid legal coverage without excessive prosecution cost, while specialization in 2 subclasses reflects a tightly scoped invention area. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Nima Labs, Inc. against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
Nienstedt GmbH
6 patents
Nightwing Group, LLC
6 patents
Nikko-Materials Co., Ltd.
6 patents
Nilar International AB
6 patents
Nine Medical, Inc.
6 patents
Nine Point Eight Inc.
6 patents
Ningbo Beilun Haiyu Automotive Lamp Co., Ltd.
6 patents
Ningbo FABE Child Safety Co., LTD.
6 patents
Nima Labs, Inc.
6 patents
What this shows Nima holds 6 patents at rank #41,994, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #41,994 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Nima's primary technology class.
Nima's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
19 Top 94% higher than 6% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2018–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 2 | 33.3% |
| 2019 | 3 | 50.0% |
| 2020 | 1 | 16.7% |
Top 2 of 2 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#41,994
Across all tracked assignees
19.2 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
Nima's 6 grants land it in the top 94% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.