Niab Trading Ltd.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 1 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2021. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A01H (NEW Plants OR ; NON-TRANSGENIC; Processes FOR Obtaining THEM; Plant Reproduction BY Tissue Culture Techniques).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Niab ranks #49,082 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 5 patents across 1 technology areas.
- #49,082
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 2nd percentile
- by Innovation Score (12.7/100)
- 5.0
- avg claims per patent
- +50%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R49082 · Foreign Corporation #49,082 · 5 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · BOTTOM-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-LOW · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 5 grants
- BOTTOM-DECILE #49,082/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH NF
- CPC-NARROW A01H · 1 areas
- INNOV-LOW 12.7/100
- CLAIMS-SPARSE 5.0 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-SURGE +50% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: NF CO.,Ltd (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Niab’s 12.7 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Niab
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Niab Trading · this assignee 13
Niab Trading · this assignee
13 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Niab's Innovation Score is 12.7/100 (2nd percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Niab?
Each dot is one of Niab’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Niab’s own 5.0 claims/patent is at or below the 13.2 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Niab's grants concentrate
Niab Trading Ltd. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 1 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under A01H (NEW Plants OR ; NON-TRANSGENIC; Processes FOR Obtaining THEM; Plant Reproduction BY Tissue Culture Techniques). Peak complete grant year is 2020 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2016. By volume, Niab sits between NF CO.,Ltd and Nielsen-kellerman, Co..
Who files at Niab's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- NF
NF CO.,Ltd
5 patents
- Nfant Labs
Nfant Labs, Inc.
5 patents
- NGK Ceramic Device
NGK Ceramic Device Co., Ltd.
5 patents
- NHK International
NHK International Corporation
5 patents
- Nidec ASI S p A
Nidec ASI S.p.A.
5 patents
- Nidec SR Drives
Nidec SR Drives, Ltd
5 patents
- Nidecker
Nidecker SA
5 patents
- Nielsen-kellerman
Nielsen-kellerman, Co.
5 patents
- Niab Trading ◀
Niab Trading Ltd.
5 patents
What this shows Niab holds 5 patents at rank #49,014, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Niab
By rank, the assignees closest to #49,014 in granted patent volume.
- NF CO.,Ltd #49,010 · 5 patents
- Nfant Labs, Inc. #49,011 · 5 patents
- NGK Ceramic Device Co., Ltd. #49,012 · 5 patents
- NHK International Corporation #49,013 · 5 patents
- Nidec ASI S.p.A. #49,015 · 5 patents
- Nidec SR Drives, Ltd #49,016 · 5 patents
- Nidecker SA #49,017 · 5 patents
- Nielsen-kellerman, Co. #49,018 · 5 patents
Leaders in A01H (NEW Plants OR)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Niab's primary technology class.
- Monsanto Technology LLC 3,234 in class
- Pioneer Hi-bred International, Inc. 2,706 in class
- Seminis Vegetable Seeds, Inc. 727 in class
- M.S. Technologies, L.L.C. 674 in class
- Syngenta Participations AG 434 in class
- Agrigenics Inc. 398 in class
- Rijk Zwaan Zaadteelt EN Zaadhandel B.V. 315 in class
- Stine Seed Farm, Inc. 253 in class
Niab's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
13 2nd percentile higher than 2% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2017 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2020 | 2 | 40.0% |
| 2021 | 1 | 20.0% |
Which technologies does Niab Trading Ltd. patent most?
Top 1 of 1 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Niab Trading Ltd.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Niab Trading Ltd.'s lead technology class is A01H (NEW Plants OR ; NON-TRANSGENIC; Processes FOR Obtaining THEM; Plant Reproduction BY Tissue Culture Techniques), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A01H
- Ranked #49,082 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Niab Trading Ltd. against NF CO.,Ltd, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 12.7/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.