Neurogastrx, Inc.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 7 granted patents across 4 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2023. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: C07D (Heterocyclic Compounds).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Neurogastrx ranks #36,652 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 7 patents across 4 technology areas.
- #36,652
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 46th percentile
- by Innovation Score (34.0/100)
- 21.9
- avg claims per patent
- +33%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R36652 · US Corporation #36,652 · 7 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-UP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 7 grants
- MID-PACK #36,652/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Nelson Stud Welding
- CPC-NARROW C07D · 4 areas
- INNOV-THIN 34.0/100
- CLAIMS-DENSE 21.9 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-UP +33% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Nelson Stud Welding, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Neurogastrx’s 34.0 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Neurogastrx
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Neurogastrx · this assignee 34
Neurogastrx · this assignee
34 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Neurogastrx's Innovation Score is 34.0/100 (46th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Neurogastrx?
Each dot is one of Neurogastrx’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Neurogastrx’s own 21.9 claims/patent is ABOVE the 13.9 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Neurogastrx's grants concentrate
Neurogastrx, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 4 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under C07D (Heterocyclic Compounds). Peak complete grant year is 2017 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, Neurogastrx sits between Nelson Stud Welding, Inc. and NEW Motion Labs Ltd..
Neurogastrx's three-year grant acceleration
Neurogastrx, Inc. shows 2 grants in 2022–2024 against only 2 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at Neurogastrx's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Nelson Stud Weldi…
Nelson Stud Welding, Inc.
7 patents
- Neothetics
Neothetics, Inc.
7 patents
- Netatmo
Netatmo
7 patents
- Netflow Logic
Netflow Logic Corporation
7 patents
- Neurolief
Neurolief Ltd.
7 patents
- NEW Cosmos Electr…
NEW Cosmos Electric Co., Ltd.
7 patents
- NEW Matterhorn
NEW Matterhorn, LLC
7 patents
- NEW Motion Labs
NEW Motion Labs Ltd.
7 patents
- Neurogastrx ◀
Neurogastrx, Inc.
7 patents
What this shows Neurogastrx holds 7 patents at rank #36,599, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Neurogastrx
By rank, the assignees closest to #36,599 in granted patent volume.
- Nelson Stud Welding, Inc. #36,595 · 7 patents
- Neothetics, Inc. #36,596 · 7 patents
- Netatmo #36,597 · 7 patents
- Netflow Logic Corporation #36,598 · 7 patents
- Neurolief Ltd. #36,600 · 7 patents
- NEW Cosmos Electric Co., Ltd. #36,601 · 7 patents
- NEW Matterhorn, LLC #36,602 · 7 patents
- NEW Motion Labs Ltd. #36,603 · 7 patents
Leaders in C07D (Heterocyclic Compounds)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Neurogastrx's primary technology class.
Neurogastrx's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
34 46th percentile higher than 46% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2017 | 2 | 28.6% |
| 2020 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2021 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2022 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2023 | 1 | 14.3% |
Which technologies does Neurogastrx, Inc. patent most?
Top 4 of 4 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Neurogastrx, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Neurogastrx, Inc.'s lead technology class is C07D (Heterocyclic Compounds), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore C07D
- Ranked #36,652 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Neurogastrx, Inc. against Nelson Stud Welding, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 34.0/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.