Where does Neopad Inc. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Neopad Inc. ranks #24,861 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Neopad Inc. hold?

Neopad Inc. holds 11 US utility patents granted between 2016 and 2024, spanning 6 technology areas.

What is Neopad Inc.'s Innovation Score?

Neopad Inc. has an Innovation Score of 36.6 out of 100 (top 46% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Neopad Inc. focus on?

Neopad Inc.'s top technology area is G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing) with 10 patents, ranking #3,601 of 13,878 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 6 CPC subclasses total.

Is Neopad Inc.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Neopad Inc.'s recent grant velocity is -62% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for Neopad Inc.'s patents?

Neopad Inc.'s patents average 21.2 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Neopad Inc. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Neopad Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 11 granted patents across 6 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Neopad ranks #24,861 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 11 patents across 6 technology areas.

#24,861
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 46%
by Innovation Score (36.6/100): 21.2
avg claims per patent: -62%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R24861 · Foreign Corporation #24,861 · 11 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 11 grants
MID-PACK #24,861/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH NCM Innovations (PTY)
CPC-NARROW G06F · 6 areas
INNOV-THIN 36.6/100
CLAIMS-DENSE 21.2 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
VEL-DROP -62% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: NCM Innovations (PTY) Ltd (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Neopad’s 36.6 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 8.6 pts (23%) Velocity 6.7 pts (18%) Breadth 8.7 pts (24%) Claim depth 12.7 pts (35%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Neopad · this assignee

37
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Neopad's Innovation Score is 36.6/100 (top 46% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Neopad?

Each dot is one of Neopad’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Neopad’s own 21.2 claims/patent is ABOVE the 12.8 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Neopad vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Neopad's grants concentrate

Neopad Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 6 CPC subclasses with 90.9% of grants classified under G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2023. By volume, Neopad sits between NCM Innovations (PTY) Ltd and Nevakar Injectables Inc..

Neopad's three-year grant acceleration

Neopad Inc. shows 3 grants in 2022–2024 against only 3 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

NCM Innovations (…

11
NDM

11
Neocis

11
Neooto

11
NestlÉ Skin Health

11
Netsweeper (Barba…

11
Neumayer Tekfor E…

11
Nevakar Injectabl…

11
Neopad ◀

11

What this shows Neopad holds 11 patents at rank #24,842, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Neopad

By rank, the assignees closest to #24,842 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Neopad's primary technology class.

Neopad's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

37 Top 46% higher than 54% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2016–2024

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Neopad Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2016	3	27.3%
2017	2	18.2%
2019	3	27.3%
2023	1	9.1%
2024	2	18.2%

Which technologies does Neopad Inc. patent most?

G06F - Electric Digital Data Processing 10

G06Q - Information AND Communication Technology [ICT] Specially Adapted FOR Administrative, Commercial, Financial, Managerial OR Supervisory PURPOSES; Systems OR Methods Specially Adapted FOR Administrative, Commercial, Financial, Managerial OR Supervisory Purposes, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 3

H04M - Telephonic Communication 2

H04L - Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication 2

G06T - Image Data Processing OR Generation, IN General 1

G07C - Time OR Attendance REGISTERS; Registering OR Indicating THE Working OF MACHINES; Generating Random NUMBERS; Voting OR Lottery APPARATUS; Arrangements, Systems OR Apparatus FOR Checking NOT Provided FOR Elsewhere 1

Top 6 of 6 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Neopad Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Neopad Inc.'s lead technology class is G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing), 90.9% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G06F
Ranked #24,861 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Neopad Inc. against NCM Innovations (PTY) Ltd, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 36.6/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.