Neon Evolution Inc.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 7 granted patents across 6 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2020–2023. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G06V (Image OR Video Recognition OR Understanding).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Neon ranks #36,642 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 7 patents across 6 technology areas.
- #36,642
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 44th percentile
- by Innovation Score (33.4/100)
- 24.9
- avg claims per patent
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R36642 · US Corporation #36,642 · 7 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-USCORP · SPAN-YRS · BOOK-RICH
- GRANTS-MICRO 7 grants
- MID-PACK #36,642/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Nedap
- CPC-NARROW G06V · 6 areas
- INNOV-THIN 33.4/100
- CLAIMS-DENSE 24.9 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- SPAN-YRS 2020–2023 · 4y
- BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Nedap N.V. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Neon’s 33.4 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Neon
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Neon Evolution · this assignee 33
Neon Evolution · this assignee
33 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Neon's Innovation Score is 33.4/100 (44th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Neon?
Each dot is one of Neon’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Neon’s own 24.9 claims/patent is ABOVE the 16.1 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Neon's grants concentrate
Neon Evolution Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 6 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under G06V (Image OR Video Recognition OR Understanding). Peak complete grant year is 2020 (4 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2021. By volume, Neon sits between Nedap N.V. and Netseer, Inc..
Neon's three-year grant acceleration
Neon Evolution Inc. shows 2 grants in 2022–2024 against only 5 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at Neon's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Nedap
Nedap N.V.
7 patents
- Neenah Paper
Neenah Paper, Inc.
7 patents
- Nelson Mandela Me…
Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University
7 patents
- Neogenix
Neogenix, LLC
7 patents
- Nerdio
Nerdio, Inc.
7 patents
- Netcomm Wireless…
NetComm Wireless Pty Ltd
7 patents
- Netronix
Netronix, Inc.
7 patents
- Netseer
Netseer, Inc.
7 patents
- Neon Evolution ◀
Neon Evolution Inc.
7 patents
What this shows Neon holds 7 patents at rank #36,696, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Neon
By rank, the assignees closest to #36,696 in granted patent volume.
- Nedap N.V. #36,692 · 7 patents
- Neenah Paper, Inc. #36,693 · 7 patents
- Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University #36,694 · 7 patents
- Neogenix, LLC #36,695 · 7 patents
- Nerdio, Inc. #36,697 · 7 patents
- NetComm Wireless Pty Ltd #36,698 · 7 patents
- Netronix, Inc. #36,699 · 7 patents
- Netseer, Inc. #36,700 · 7 patents
Leaders in G06V (Image OR Video Recognition OR Understanding)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Neon's primary technology class.
- Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 3,022 in class
- International Business Machines Corporation 2,565 in class
- Google LLC 1,829 in class
- NEC Corporation 1,631 in class
- Canon Kabushiki Kaisha 1,549 in class
- Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC 1,310 in class
- Sony Group Corporation 1,287 in class
- Apple Inc. 1,177 in class
Neon's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
33 44th percentile higher than 44% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2020–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 4 | 57.1% |
| 2021 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2022 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2023 | 1 | 14.3% |
Which technologies does Neon Evolution Inc. patent most?
Top 6 of 6 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Neon Evolution Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Neon Evolution Inc.'s lead technology class is G06V (Image OR Video Recognition OR Understanding), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G06V
- Ranked #36,642 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Neon Evolution Inc. against Nedap N.V., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 33.4/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.