NEO Design, LLC
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 8 granted patents across 5 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2020–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B60B (Vehicle Wheels ; CASTORS; Axles FOR Wheels OR CASTORS; Increasing Wheel Adhesion).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, NEO ranks #32,603 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 8 patents across 5 technology areas.
- #32,603
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 35th percentile
- by Innovation Score (30.6/100)
- 14.0
- avg claims per patent
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R32603 · US Corporation #32,603 · 8 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · SPAN-YRS · BOOK-RICH
- GRANTS-MICRO 8 grants
- MID-PACK #32,603/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH NCX
- CPC-NARROW B60B · 5 areas
- INNOV-THIN 30.6/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 14.0 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- SPAN-YRS 2020–2024 · 5y
- BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: NCX Corporation (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How NEO’s 30.6 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around NEO
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- NEO Design · this assignee 31
NEO Design · this assignee
31 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows NEO's Innovation Score is 30.6/100 (35th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for NEO?
Each dot is one of NEO’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). NEO’s own 14.0 claims/patent is at or below the 14.4 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where NEO's grants concentrate
NEO Design, LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 5 CPC subclasses with 50% of grants classified under B60B (Vehicle Wheels ; CASTORS; Axles FOR Wheels OR CASTORS; Increasing Wheel Adhesion). Peak complete grant year is 2020 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2021. By volume, NEO sits between NCX Corporation and Neurim Pharmaceuticals (1991) Ltd..
NEO's three-year grant acceleration
NEO Design, LLC shows 4 grants in 2022–2024 against only 4 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at NEO's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- NCX
NCX Corporation
8 patents
- Nebbiolo
Nebbiolo Technologies, Inc.
8 patents
- NEC Energy Soluti…
NEC Energy Solutions, Inc.
8 patents
- NEC Engineering
NEC Engineering, Ltd.
8 patents
- Neosapience
Neosapience, Inc.
8 patents
- Netherlands Trans…
Netherlands Translational Research Center B.V.
8 patents
- Netimpact Strateg…
Netimpact Strategies, Inc.
8 patents
- Neurim Pharmaceut…
Neurim Pharmaceuticals (1991) Ltd.
8 patents
- NEO Design ◀
NEO Design, LLC
8 patents
What this shows NEO holds 8 patents at rank #32,576, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near NEO
By rank, the assignees closest to #32,576 in granted patent volume.
- NCX Corporation #32,572 · 8 patents
- Nebbiolo Technologies, Inc. #32,573 · 8 patents
- NEC Energy Solutions, Inc. #32,574 · 8 patents
- NEC Engineering, Ltd. #32,575 · 8 patents
- Neosapience, Inc. #32,577 · 8 patents
- Netherlands Translational Research Center B.V. #32,578 · 8 patents
- Netimpact Strategies, Inc. #32,579 · 8 patents
- Neurim Pharmaceuticals (1991) Ltd. #32,580 · 8 patents
Leaders in B60B (Vehicle Wheels)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in NEO's primary technology class.
NEO's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
31 35th percentile higher than 35% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2020–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 3 | 37.5% |
| 2021 | 1 | 12.5% |
| 2022 | 3 | 37.5% |
| 2024 | 1 | 12.5% |
Which technologies does NEO Design, LLC patent most?
Top 5 of 5 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
NEO Design, LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- NEO Design, LLC's lead technology class is B60B (Vehicle Wheels ; CASTORS; Axles FOR Wheels OR CASTORS; Increasing Wheel Adhesion), 50% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore B60B
- Ranked #32,603 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare NEO Design, LLC against NCX Corporation, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 30.6/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.