PlainPatent
USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Neenah Foundry Company

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 9 granted patents across 4 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2022. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: E02D (FOUNDATIONS; EXCAVATIONS; Embankments ; Underground OR Underwater Structures).

RSS updates for this company
Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Neenah ranks #29,566 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 9 patents across 4 technology areas.

#29,566
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
18th percentile
by Innovation Score (25.6/100)
14.9
avg claims per patent
-20%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R29566 · US Corporation #29,566 · 9 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DOWN · BOOK-FULL

  • GRANTS-MICRO 9 grants
  • MID-PACK #29,566/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Navipharm
  • CPC-NARROW E02D · 4 areas
  • INNOV-THIN 25.6/100
  • CLAIMS-RICH 14.9 claims/avg
  • TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
  • VEL-DOWN -20% vel
  • BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Navipharm Co., Ltd. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Neenah’s 25.6 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around Neenah

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows Neenah's Innovation Score is 25.6/100 (18th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Neenah?

Each dot is one of Neenah’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Neenah’s own 14.9 claims/patent is ABOVE the 10.9 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Neenah vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 8.98.999.1 0510152025 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Navipharm Co., Ltd. - 9, 8.44NavipharmNear Earth Autonomy, Inc. - 9, 17.89Near Earth Autono…Nebia Inc. - 9, 11NebiaNectar International Co., Ltd - 9, 1Nectar Internatio…Nefeli Networks, Inc. - 9, 21.67Nefeli NetworksNeoculi Pty Ltd - 9, 10.56Neoculi PtyNeogen Food Safety US HoldCo Corporation - 9, 10.89Neogen Food Safet…Nestwave SAS - 9, 13.33Nestwave SASNeenah Foundry Company - 9, 14.89Neenah Foundry
Neenah vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Neenah's grants concentrate

Neenah Foundry Company is a focused PatentsView assignee: 4 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under E02D (FOUNDATIONS; EXCAVATIONS; Embankments ; Underground OR Underwater Structures). Peak complete grant year is 2018 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2016. By volume, Neenah sits between Navipharm Co., Ltd. and Nestwave SAS.

Neenah's three-year grant acceleration

Neenah Foundry Company shows 1 grants in 2022–2024 against only 4 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Who files at Neenah's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Neenah holds 9 patents at rank #29,585, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Neenah

By rank, the assignees closest to #29,585 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in E02D (Foundations)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Neenah's primary technology class.

Neenah's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

26 18th percentile higher than 18% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

0.511.522.533.5 20162018201920212022 1
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2016–2022

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Neenah Foundry Company patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2016 1 11.1%
2018 3 33.3%
2019 1 11.1%
2021 3 33.3%
2022 1 11.1%

Which technologies does Neenah Foundry Company patent most?

Top 4 of 4 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Neenah Foundry Company's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • Neenah Foundry Company's lead technology class is E02D (FOUNDATIONS; EXCAVATIONS; Embankments ; Underground OR Underwater Structures), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore E02D
  • Ranked #29,566 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare Neenah Foundry Company against Navipharm Co., Ltd., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 25.6/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page
  • USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
  • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
  • USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.