National Comprehensive Cancer Network
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 12 granted patents across 0 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2023. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength.
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, National ranks #23,047 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 12 patents across 0 technology areas.
- #23,047
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 2nd percentile
- by Innovation Score (11.7/100)
- 1.0
- avg claims per patent
- -50%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R23047 · US Corporation #23,047 · 12 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-UNK · INNOV-LOW · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-RICH
- GRANTS-MICRO 12 grants
- MID-PACK #23,047/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Nano Precision Taiwan
- CPC-UNK CPC blank
- INNOV-LOW 11.7/100
- CLAIMS-SPARSE 1.0 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -50% vel
- BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Nano Precision Taiwan Limited (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How National’s 11.7 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around National
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- National Comprehensi… · this assignee 12
National Comprehensi… · this assignee
12 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows National's Innovation Score is 11.7/100 (2nd percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for National?
Each dot is one of National’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). National’s own 1.0 claims/patent is at or below the 15.1 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where National's grants concentrate
National Comprehensive Cancer Network is a focused PatentsView assignee: 0 CPC subclasses . Peak complete grant year is 2019 (4 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2017. By volume, National sits between Nano Precision Taiwan Limited and Nationwide 5, LLC.
National's three-year grant acceleration
National Comprehensive Cancer Network shows 2 grants in 2022–2024 against only 6 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at National's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Nano Precision Ta…
Nano Precision Taiwan Limited
12 patents
- Nanotech Industri…
Nanotech Industrial Solutions
12 patents
- Nanotemper
Nanotemper Technologies GMBH
12 patents
- Nanowave
Nanowave Technologies Inc.
12 patents
- National Flooring…
National Flooring Equipment, Inc.
12 patents
- National Presort
National Presort, LLC
12 patents
- National Security
National Security Technologies LLC
12 patents
- Nationwide 5
Nationwide 5, LLC
12 patents
- National Comprehe… ◀
National Comprehensive Cancer Network
12 patents
What this shows National holds 12 patents at rank #23,071, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near National
By rank, the assignees closest to #23,071 in granted patent volume.
- Nano Precision Taiwan Limited #23,067 · 12 patents
- Nanotech Industrial Solutions #23,068 · 12 patents
- Nanotemper Technologies GMBH #23,069 · 12 patents
- Nanowave Technologies Inc. #23,070 · 12 patents
- National Flooring Equipment, Inc. #23,072 · 12 patents
- National Presort, LLC #23,073 · 12 patents
- National Security Technologies LLC #23,074 · 12 patents
- Nationwide 5, LLC #23,075 · 12 patents
National's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
12 2nd percentile higher than 2% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 3 | 25.0% |
| 2017 | 1 | 8.3% |
| 2019 | 4 | 33.3% |
| 2021 | 2 | 16.7% |
| 2023 | 2 | 16.7% |
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
National Comprehensive Cancer Network's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Ranked #23,047 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare National Comprehensive Cancer Network against Nano Precision Taiwan Limited, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 11.7/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.