Napo Enterprises, LLC
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 17 granted patents across 9 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2019. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Napo ranks #17,015 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 17 patents across 9 technology areas.
- #17,015
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- Top 50%
- by Innovation Score (35.2/100)
- 24.4
- avg claims per patent
- -100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R17015 · US Corporation #17,015 · 17 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 17 grants
- MID-PACK #17,015/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Nano One Materials
- CPC-NARROW G06F · 9 areas
- INNOV-THIN 35.2/100
- CLAIMS-DENSE 24.4 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -100% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Nano One Materials Corp. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Napo’s 35.2 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Napo
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Napo Enterprises · this assignee
Napo Enterprises · this assignee
35 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Napo's Innovation Score is 35.2/100 (top 50% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Napo?
Each dot is one of Napo’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Napo’s own 24.4 claims/patent is ABOVE the 13.4 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Napo's grants concentrate
Napo Enterprises, LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 9 CPC subclasses with 76.5% of grants classified under G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (10 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2019. By volume, Napo sits between Nuvo Group Ltd. and Nemo Power Tools Ltd.
Who files at Napo's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Nuvo Group
Nuvo Group Ltd.
17 patents
- NVF Tech
NVF Tech Ltd
17 patents
- Nano One Materials
Nano One Materials Corp.
17 patents
- Nantkwest
Nantkwest, Inc.
17 patents
- National Institut…
National Institutes of Health, Office of Technology Transfer
17 patents
- Navvis
NavVis GmbH
17 patents
- Navitor Pharmaceu…
Navitor Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
17 patents
- Nemo Power Tools
Nemo Power Tools Ltd
17 patents
- Napo Enterprises ◀
Napo Enterprises, LLC
17 patents
What this shows Napo holds 17 patents at rank #17,033, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Napo
By rank, the assignees closest to #17,033 in granted patent volume.
- Nuvo Group Ltd. #17,029 · 17 patents
- NVF Tech Ltd #17,030 · 17 patents
- Nano One Materials Corp. #17,031 · 17 patents
- Nantkwest, Inc. #17,032 · 17 patents
- National Institutes of Health, Office of Technology Transfer #17,034 · 17 patents
- NavVis GmbH #17,035 · 17 patents
- Navitor Pharmaceuticals, Inc. #17,036 · 17 patents
- Nemo Power Tools Ltd #17,037 · 17 patents
Leaders in G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Napo's primary technology class.
- International Business Machines Corporation 42,717 in class
- Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 21,497 in class
- Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC 16,951 in class
- Google LLC 13,092 in class
- Intel Corporation 12,803 in class
- Apple Inc. 11,007 in class
- Amazon Technologies, Inc. 10,217 in class
- Dell Products L.P. 7,187 in class
Napo's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
35 Top 50% higher than 50% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 10 | 58.8% |
| 2016 | 4 | 23.5% |
| 2017 | 2 | 11.8% |
| 2019 | 1 | 5.9% |
Which technologies does Napo Enterprises, LLC patent most?
Top 9 of 9 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Napo Enterprises, LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Napo Enterprises, LLC's lead technology class is G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing), 76.5% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G06F
- Ranked #17,015 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Napo Enterprises, LLC against Nuvo Group Ltd., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 35.2/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.