MV Pipe Technologies GmbH
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 5 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2018–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: F16L (PIPES; Joints OR Fittings FOR PIPES; Supports FOR Pipes, Cables OR Protective TUBING; Means FOR Thermal Insulation IN General).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, MV ranks #48,906 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 5 patents across 5 technology areas.
- #48,906
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 39th percentile
- by Innovation Score (31.7/100)
- 18.2
- avg claims per patent
- +50%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R48906 · Foreign Corporation #48,906 · 5 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · BOTTOM-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 5 grants
- BOTTOM-DECILE #48,906/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Multy Home
- CPC-NARROW F16L · 5 areas
- INNOV-THIN 31.7/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 18.2 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-SURGE +50% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Multy Home LP (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How MV’s 31.7 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around MV
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- MV Pipe · this assignee 32
MV Pipe · this assignee
32 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows MV's Innovation Score is 31.7/100 (39th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for MV?
Each dot is one of MV’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). MV’s own 18.2 claims/patent is ABOVE the 6.8 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where MV's grants concentrate
MV Pipe Technologies GmbH is a focused PatentsView assignee: 5 CPC subclasses with 60% of grants classified under F16L (PIPES; Joints OR Fittings FOR PIPES; Supports FOR Pipes, Cables OR Protective TUBING; Means FOR Thermal Insulation IN General). By volume, MV sits between Multy Home LP and MX3 Diagnostics, Inc..
MV's three-year grant acceleration
MV Pipe Technologies GmbH shows 2 grants in 2022–2024 against only 2 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at MV's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Multy Home
Multy Home LP
5 patents
- Muro
Muro Corporation
5 patents
- Musthane
Musthane
5 patents
- Muzlive
Muzlive Inc.
5 patents
- Mvrix
Mvrix Co., Ltd.
5 patents
- MVW Holdings
MVW Holdings, Inc.
5 patents
- MWI Micro Wave Ig…
MWI Micro Wave Ignition AG
5 patents
- MX3 Diagnostics
MX3 Diagnostics, Inc.
5 patents
- MV Pipe ◀
MV Pipe Technologies GmbH
5 patents
What this shows MV holds 5 patents at rank #48,724, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near MV
By rank, the assignees closest to #48,724 in granted patent volume.
Leaders in F16L (Pipes)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in MV's primary technology class.
- Saudi Arabian OIL Company 154 in class
- Vallourec OIL AND GAS France 122 in class
- Mueller International, LLC 111 in class
- Nippon Steel Corporation 99 in class
- Whirlpool Corporation 92 in class
- Eaton Intelligent Power Limited 84 in class
- Airbus Operations Limited 77 in class
- Victaulic Company 77 in class
MV's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
32 39th percentile higher than 39% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2018–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2019 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2020 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2022 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2024 | 1 | 20.0% |
Which technologies does MV Pipe Technologies GmbH patent most?
Top 5 of 5 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
MV Pipe Technologies GmbH's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- MV Pipe Technologies GmbH's lead technology class is F16L (PIPES; Joints OR Fittings FOR PIPES; Supports FOR Pipes, Cables OR Protective TUBING; Means FOR Thermal Insulation IN General), 60% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore F16L
- Ranked #48,906 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare MV Pipe Technologies GmbH against Multy Home LP, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 31.7/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.