Where does MT.DERM GMBH rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), MT.DERM GMBH ranks #21,479 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does MT.DERM GMBH hold?

MT.DERM GMBH holds 13 US utility patents granted between 2016 and 2023, spanning 7 technology areas.

What is MT.DERM GMBH's Innovation Score?

MT.DERM GMBH has an Innovation Score of 28.7 out of 100 (28th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

Is MT.DERM GMBH's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

MT.DERM GMBH's recent grant velocity is -14% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for MT.DERM GMBH's patents?

MT.DERM GMBH's patents average 12.6 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the MT.DERM GMBH patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

MT.DERM GMBH

Q: What technology areas does MT.DERM GMBH focus on?

MT.DERM GMBH's top technology area is A61M (Devices FOR Introducing Media Into, OR Onto, THE Body ; Devices FOR Transducing Body Media OR FOR Taking Media From THE Body ; Devices FOR Producing OR Ending Sleep OR Stupor) with 11 patents, ranking #638 of 3,490 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 7 CPC subclasses total.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 13 granted patents across 7 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2023. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A61M (Devices FOR Introducing Media Into, OR Onto, THE Body ; Devices FOR Transducing Body Media OR FOR Taking Media From THE Body ; Devices FOR Producing OR Ending Sleep OR Stupor).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Mt.derm ranks #21,479 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 13 patents across 7 technology areas.

#21,479
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 28th percentile
by Innovation Score (28.7/100): 12.6
avg claims per patent: -14%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R21479 · Foreign Corporation #21,479 · 13 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DOWN · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 13 grants
MID-PACK #21,479/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Magnemotion
CPC-NARROW A61M · 7 areas
INNOV-THIN 28.7/100
CLAIMS-RICH 12.6 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
VEL-DOWN -14% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Magnemotion, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Mt.derm’s 28.7 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 9.1 pts (32%) Velocity 2.7 pts (9%) Breadth 9.4 pts (33%) Claim depth 7.6 pts (26%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
MT DERM · this assignee

29
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Mt.derm's Innovation Score is 28.7/100 (28th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Mt.derm?

Each dot is one of Mt.derm’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Mt.derm’s own 12.6 claims/patent is at or below the 15.6 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Mt.derm vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Mt.derm's grants concentrate

MT.DERM GMBH is a focused PatentsView assignee: 7 CPC subclasses with 84.6% of grants classified under A61M (Devices FOR Introducing Media Into, OR Onto, THE Body ; Devices FOR Transducing Body Media OR FOR Taking Media From THE Body ; Devices FOR Producing OR Ending Sleep OR Stupor). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2018. By volume, Mt.derm sits between Moonshadow Mobile, Inc. and Magnet Forensics Inc..

Mt.derm's three-year grant acceleration

MT.DERM GMBH shows 2 grants in 2022–2024 against only 5 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Moonshadow Mobile

13
Morphpackers

13
Morryde Internati…

13
MSC & Sgcc

13
Murdoch Childrens…

13
Music Express

13
Magnemotion

13
Magnet Forensics

13
MT DERM ◀

13

What this shows MT.DERM holds 13 patents at rank #21,435, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near MTDERM

By rank, the assignees closest to #21,435 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in A61M (Devices FOR Introducing Media Into)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in MTDERM's primary technology class.

Mt.derm's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

29 28th percentile higher than 28% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2016–2023

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

MT.DERM GMBH patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2016	3	23.1%
2017	2	15.4%
2018	1	7.7%
2019	1	7.7%
2020	3	23.1%
2021	1	7.7%
2023	2	15.4%

Which technologies does MT.DERM GMBH patent most?

A61M - Devices FOR Introducing Media Into, OR Onto, THE Body ; Devices FOR Transducing Body Media OR FOR Taking Media From THE Body ; Devices FOR Producing OR Ending Sleep OR Stupor 11

A01K - Animal HUSBANDRY; AVICULTURE; APICULTURE; PISCICULTURE; FISHING; Rearing OR Breeding Animals, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR; NEW Breeds OF Animals 4

A61B - DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification 3

A61D - Veterinary Instruments, Implements, Tools, OR Methods 1

G05D - Systems FOR Controlling OR Regulating Non-electric Variables 1

B01L - Chemical OR Physical Laboratory Apparatus FOR General USE 1

G01F - Measuring Volume, Volume Flow, Mass Flow OR Liquid LEVEL; Metering BY Volume 1

Top 7 of 7 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

MT.DERM GMBH's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

MT.DERM GMBH's lead technology class is A61M (Devices FOR Introducing Media Into, OR Onto, THE Body ; Devices FOR Transducing Body Media OR FOR Taking Media From THE Body ; Devices FOR Producing OR Ending Sleep OR Stupor), 84.6% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A61M
Ranked #21,479 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare MT.DERM GMBH against Moonshadow Mobile, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 28.7/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.