Mozilla Corporation
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 7 granted patents across 3 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2020. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H04N (Pictorial Communication, e.g. Television).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Mozilla ranks #36,562 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 7 patents across 3 technology areas.
- #36,562
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 12th percentile
- by Innovation Score (23.2/100)
- 16.4
- avg claims per patent
- -83%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R36562 · US Corporation #36,562 · 7 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 7 grants
- MID-PACK #36,562/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Mosway
- CPC-NARROW H04N · 3 areas
- INNOV-THIN 23.2/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 16.4 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -83% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Mosway Technologies Limited (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Mozilla’s 23.2 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Mozilla
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Mozilla · this assignee 23
Mozilla · this assignee
23 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Mozilla's Innovation Score is 23.2/100 (12th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Mozilla?
Each dot is one of Mozilla’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Mozilla’s own 16.4 claims/patent is ABOVE the 15.4 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Mozilla's grants concentrate
Mozilla Corporation is a focused PatentsView assignee: 3 CPC subclasses with 85.7% of grants classified under H04N (Pictorial Communication, e.g. Television). Peak complete grant year is 2017 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2016. By volume, Mozilla sits between Mosway Technologies Limited and Murex S.A.S..
Who files at Mozilla's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Mosway
Mosway Technologies Limited
7 patents
- Motion Engine
Motion Engine Inc.
7 patents
- Motus Integrated
Motus Integrated Technologies
7 patents
- Mount Sinai Schoo…
Mount Sinai School of Medicine
7 patents
- Mul-t-lock
Mul-T-Lock Technologies Ltd.
7 patents
- Multimorphic
Multimorphic, Inc.
7 patents
- Multiple Energy
Multiple Energy Technologies LLC
7 patents
- Murex S
Murex S.A.S.
7 patents
- Mozilla ◀
Mozilla Corporation
7 patents
What this shows Mozilla holds 7 patents at rank #36,555, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Mozilla
By rank, the assignees closest to #36,555 in granted patent volume.
- Mosway Technologies Limited #36,551 · 7 patents
- Motion Engine Inc. #36,552 · 7 patents
- Motus Integrated Technologies #36,553 · 7 patents
- Mount Sinai School of Medicine #36,554 · 7 patents
- Mul-T-Lock Technologies Ltd. #36,556 · 7 patents
- Multimorphic, Inc. #36,557 · 7 patents
- Multiple Energy Technologies LLC #36,558 · 7 patents
- Murex S.A.S. #36,559 · 7 patents
Leaders in H04N (Pictorial Communication)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Mozilla's primary technology class.
Mozilla's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
23 12th percentile higher than 12% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2017 | 2 | 28.6% |
| 2018 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2019 | 2 | 28.6% |
| 2020 | 1 | 14.3% |
Which technologies does Mozilla Corporation patent most?
Top 3 of 3 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Mozilla Corporation's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Mozilla Corporation's lead technology class is H04N (Pictorial Communication, e.g. Television), 85.7% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H04N
- Ranked #36,562 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Mozilla Corporation against Mosway Technologies Limited, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 23.2/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.