USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Montres Tudor SA

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 7 granted patents across 4 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G04B (Mechanically-driven Clocks OR WATCHES; Mechanical Parts OF Clocks OR Watches IN GENERAL; Time Pieces Using THE Position OF THE SUN, Moon OR Stars).

RSS updates for this company

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Montres ranks #36,549 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 7 patents across 4 technology areas.

#36,549
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
47th percentile
by Innovation Score (34.3/100)
22.3
avg claims per patent
-80%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R36549 · Foreign Corporation #36,549 · 7 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

  • GRANTS-MICRO 7 grants
  • MID-PACK #36,549/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Monalisa Group
  • CPC-NARROW G04B · 4 areas
  • INNOV-THIN 34.3/100
  • CLAIMS-DENSE 22.3 claims/avg
  • TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
  • VEL-DROP -80% vel
  • BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Monalisa Group Co., Ltd (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Montres’s 34.3 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around Montres

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows Montres's Innovation Score is 34.3/100 (47th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Montres?

Each dot is one of Montres’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Montres’s own 22.3 claims/patent is ABOVE the 15.0 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Montres vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 6.97.07.077.07.07.1 510152025 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Monalisa Group Co., Ltd - 7, 6.57Monalisa GroupMono Slab EZ Form LLC - 7, 16.29Mono Slab EZ FormMonogram Aerospace Fasteners, Inc. - 7, 15.43Monogram Aerospac…Montage Electronics (SHANGHAI) Co - 7, 15.43Montage (Shanghai)Morpheus AG - 7, 14.43MorpheusMosaic Biosciences, Inc. - 7, 19.14Mosaic BiosciencesMoteck Electric Corp. - 7, 7.71Moteck ElectricMozido, Inc. - 7, 15MozidoMontres Tudor SA - 7, 22.29Montres Tudor
Montres vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Montres's grants concentrate

Montres Tudor SA is a focused PatentsView assignee: 4 CPC subclasses with 71.4% of grants classified under G04B (Mechanically-driven Clocks OR WATCHES; Mechanical Parts OF Clocks OR Watches IN GENERAL; Time Pieces Using THE Position OF THE SUN, Moon OR Stars). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2016. By volume, Montres sits between Monalisa Group Co., Ltd and Mozido, Inc..

Montres's three-year grant acceleration

Montres Tudor SA shows 1 grants in 2022–2024 against only 1 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Who files at Montres's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Montres holds 7 patents at rank #36,419, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Montres

By rank, the assignees closest to #36,419 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in G04B (Mechanically-driven Clocks OR Watches)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Montres's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Montres, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In G04B (Mechanically-driven Clocks OR Watches), Montres ranks #29 of 92 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (34 here).

Montres's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

34 47th percentile higher than 47% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

0.511.522.533.5 20152016201920232025 1
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Montres Tudor SA patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2015 3 42.9%
2016 1 14.3%
2019 1 14.3%
2023 1 14.3%
2025partial year 1 14.3%

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

What to do with this data

Montres Tudor SA's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • Montres Tudor SA's lead technology class is G04B (Mechanically-driven Clocks OR WATCHES; Mechanical Parts OF Clocks OR Watches IN GENERAL; Time Pieces Using THE Position OF THE SUN, Moon OR Stars), 71.4% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G04B
  • Ranked #36,549 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare Montres Tudor SA against Monalisa Group Co., Ltd, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 34.3/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.