Where does Montres Tudor SA rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Montres Tudor SA ranks #36,549 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Montres Tudor SA hold?

Montres Tudor SA holds 7 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2025, spanning 4 technology areas.

What is Montres Tudor SA's Innovation Score?

Montres Tudor SA has an Innovation Score of 34.3 out of 100 (47th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

Is Montres Tudor SA's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Montres Tudor SA's recent grant velocity is -80% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for Montres Tudor SA's patents?

Montres Tudor SA's patents average 22.3 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Montres Tudor SA patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Montres Tudor SA

Q: What technology areas does Montres Tudor SA focus on?

Montres Tudor SA's top technology area is G04B (Mechanically-driven Clocks OR WATCHES; Mechanical Parts OF Clocks OR Watches IN GENERAL; Time Pieces Using THE Position OF THE SUN, Moon OR Stars) with 5 patents. Grants appear in 4 CPC subclasses total.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 7 granted patents across 4 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G04B (Mechanically-driven Clocks OR WATCHES; Mechanical Parts OF Clocks OR Watches IN GENERAL; Time Pieces Using THE Position OF THE SUN, Moon OR Stars).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Montres ranks #36,549 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 7 patents across 4 technology areas.

#36,549
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 47th percentile
by Innovation Score (34.3/100): 22.3
avg claims per patent: -80%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R36549 · Foreign Corporation #36,549 · 7 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 7 grants
MID-PACK #36,549/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Monalisa Group
CPC-NARROW G04B · 4 areas
INNOV-THIN 34.3/100
CLAIMS-DENSE 22.3 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
VEL-DROP -80% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Monalisa Group Co., Ltd (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
FCI Asia Pte · near

34
Imds · near

34
Mellanox Silicon… · near

34
Montres Tudor · this assignee

34
Trodat · near

34
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Montres's Innovation Score is 34.3/100 (47th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Where Montres's grants concentrate

Montres Tudor SA is a focused PatentsView assignee: 4 CPC subclasses with 71.4% of grants classified under G04B (Mechanically-driven Clocks OR WATCHES; Mechanical Parts OF Clocks OR Watches IN GENERAL; Time Pieces Using THE Position OF THE SUN, Moon OR Stars). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2016. By volume, Montres sits between Monalisa Group Co., Ltd and Mozido, Inc..

Montres's three-year grant acceleration

Montres Tudor SA shows 1 grants in 2022–2024 against only 1 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Monalisa Group

7
Mono Slab EZ Form

7
Monogram Aerospac…

7
Montage (Shanghai)

7
Morpheus

7
Mosaic Biosciences

7
Moteck Electric

7
Mozido

7
Montres Tudor ◀

7

What this shows Montres holds 7 patents at rank #36,419, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Montres

By rank, the assignees closest to #36,419 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in G04B (Mechanically-driven Clocks OR Watches)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Montres's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Montres, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above).

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (34 here).

FCI Asia Pte, Ltd. 34 Trodat GmbH 34 Mellanox Technologies Silicon Photonics Inc. 34 Imds LLC 34

Montres's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

34 47th percentile higher than 47% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Montres Tudor SA patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	3	42.9%
2016	1	14.3%
2019	1	14.3%
2023	1	14.3%
2025partial year	1	14.3%

Which technologies does Montres Tudor SA patent most?

G04B - Mechanically-driven Clocks OR WATCHES; Mechanical Parts OF Clocks OR Watches IN GENERAL; Time Pieces Using THE Position OF THE SUN, Moon OR Stars 5

A44C - Personal Adornments, e.g. JEWELLERY; Coins 2

Y10T - Technical Subjects Covered BY Former US Classification 1

G04D - Apparatus OR Tools Specially Designed FOR Making OR Maintaining Clocks OR Watches 1

Top 4 of 4 technology areas

Where it ranks

Overall rank by patents

#36,549

of 49,997 tracked assignees

Innovation Score

34.3 out of 100

View all rankings →

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Montres Tudor SA's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Montres Tudor SA's lead technology class is G04B (Mechanically-driven Clocks OR WATCHES; Mechanical Parts OF Clocks OR Watches IN GENERAL; Time Pieces Using THE Position OF THE SUN, Moon OR Stars), 71.4% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G04B
Ranked #36,549 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Montres Tudor SA against Monalisa Group Co., Ltd, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 34.3/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.