Where does Monster Energy Company rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Monster Energy Company ranks #20,100 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Monster Energy Company hold?

Monster Energy Company holds 14 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2025, spanning 2 technology areas.

What is Monster Energy Company's Innovation Score?

Monster Energy Company has an Innovation Score of 16.7 out of 100 (4th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

Is Monster Energy Company's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Monster Energy Company's recent grant velocity is -37% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for Monster Energy Company's patents?

Monster Energy Company's patents average 2.9 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Monster Energy Company patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Monster Energy Company

Q: What technology areas does Monster Energy Company focus on?

Monster Energy Company's top technology area is A47F (Special Furniture, Fittings, OR Accessories FOR Shops, Storehouses, Bars, Restaurants OR THE LIKE; Paying Counters) with 1 patents, ranking #272 of 482 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 2 CPC subclasses total.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 14 granted patents across 2 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A47F (Special Furniture, Fittings, OR Accessories FOR Shops, Storehouses, Bars, Restaurants OR THE LIKE; Paying Counters).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Monster ranks #20,100 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 14 patents across 2 technology areas.

#20,100
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 4th percentile
by Innovation Score (16.7/100): 2.9
avg claims per patent: -37%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R20100 · US Corporation #20,100 · 14 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-LOW · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DOWN · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 14 grants
MID-PACK #20,100/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Miller Weldmaster
CPC-NARROW A47F · 2 areas
INNOV-LOW 16.7/100
CLAIMS-SPARSE 2.9 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-DOWN -37% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Miller Weldmaster Corporation (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Monster’s 16.7 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 9.4 pts (56%) Velocity 0.7 pts (4%) Breadth 5.0 pts (30%) Claim depth 1.7 pts (10%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Monster Energy · this assignee

17
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Monster's Innovation Score is 16.7/100 (4th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Monster?

Each dot is one of Monster’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Monster’s own 2.9 claims/patent is at or below the 15.9 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Monster vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Monster's grants concentrate

Monster Energy Company is a focused PatentsView assignee: 2 CPC subclasses with 7.1% of grants classified under A47F (Special Furniture, Fittings, OR Accessories FOR Shops, Storehouses, Bars, Restaurants OR THE LIKE; Paying Counters). Peak complete grant year is 2019 (6 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2024. By volume, Monster sits between Miller Weldmaster Corporation and Multi-Color Corporation.

Monster's three-year grant acceleration

Monster Energy Company shows 1 grants in 2022–2024 against only 10 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Miller Weldmaster

14
Mincon Internatio…

14
Miosoft

14
Molonlave Group

14
Montres Jaquet Dr…

14
Morega Systems

14
Morphic Therapeut…

14
Multi-color

14
Monster Energy ◀

14

What this shows Monster holds 14 patents at rank #20,107, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Monster

By rank, the assignees closest to #20,107 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in A47F (Special Furniture)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Monster's primary technology class.

Monster's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

17 4th percentile higher than 4% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Monster Energy Company patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	2	14.3%
2019	6	42.9%
2020	4	28.6%
2024	1	7.1%
2025partial year	1	7.1%

Which technologies does Monster Energy Company patent most?

A47F - Special Furniture, Fittings, OR Accessories FOR Shops, Storehouses, Bars, Restaurants OR THE LIKE; Paying Counters 1

A47B - TABLES; DESKS; Office FURNITURE; CABINETS; DRAWERS; General Details OF Furniture 1

Top 2 of 2 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Monster Energy Company's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Monster Energy Company's lead technology class is A47F (Special Furniture, Fittings, OR Accessories FOR Shops, Storehouses, Bars, Restaurants OR THE LIKE; Paying Counters), 7.1% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A47F
Ranked #20,100 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Monster Energy Company against Miller Weldmaster Corporation, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 16.7/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.