MLR, LLC
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 3 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2023. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G10L (Speech Analysis Techniques OR Speech SYNTHESIS; Speech RECOGNITION; Speech OR Voice Processing TECHNIQUES; Speech OR Audio Coding OR Decoding).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, MLR ranks #48,800 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 5 patents across 3 technology areas.
- #48,800
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- Top 29%
- by Innovation Score (43.2/100)
- 18.2
- avg claims per patent
- +300%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R48800 · US Corporation #48,800 · 5 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · BOTTOM-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 5 grants
- BOTTOM-DECILE #48,800/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Mizuno Technics
- CPC-NARROW G10L · 3 areas
- INNOV-PAR 43.2/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 18.2 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-SURGE +300% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Mizuno Technics Corporation (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How MLR’s 43.2 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around MLR
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- MLR · this assignee
MLR · this assignee
43 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows MLR's Innovation Score is 43.2/100 (top 29% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for MLR?
Each dot is one of MLR’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). MLR’s own 18.2 claims/patent is ABOVE the 9.2 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where MLR's grants concentrate
MLR, LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 3 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under G10L (Speech Analysis Techniques OR Speech SYNTHESIS; Speech RECOGNITION; Speech OR Voice Processing TECHNIQUES; Speech OR Audio Coding OR Decoding). Peak complete grant year is 2023 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2016. By volume, MLR sits between Mizuno Technics Corporation and Moatech Co., Ltd.
MLR's three-year grant acceleration
MLR, LLC shows 3 grants in 2022–2024 against only 1 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at MLR's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Mizuno Technics
Mizuno Technics Corporation
5 patents
- MJB Wood Group
MJB Wood Group, LLC
5 patents
- MJE
MJE, LLC
5 patents
- MK Group JSC
MK Group JSC
5 patents
- Mmag
Mmag Co., Ltd.
5 patents
- MMI
MMI AG
5 patents
- Moasis Global
Moasis Global Corporation
5 patents
- Moatech
Moatech Co., Ltd
5 patents
- MLR ◀
MLR, LLC
5 patents
What this shows MLR holds 5 patents at rank #48,663, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near MLR
By rank, the assignees closest to #48,663 in granted patent volume.
Leaders in G10L (Speech Analysis Techniques OR Speech Synthesis)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in MLR's primary technology class.
- Google LLC 2,230 in class
- Amazon Technologies, Inc. 1,661 in class
- International Business Machines Corporation 1,520 in class
- Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC 897 in class
- Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft zur förderung der angewandten Forschung e.V. 760 in class
- Apple Inc. 705 in class
- Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation 680 in class
- Dolby International AB 641 in class
MLR's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
43 Top 29% higher than 71% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2020 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2022 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2023 | 2 | 40.0% |
Which technologies does MLR, LLC patent most?
Top 3 of 3 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
MLR, LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- MLR, LLC's lead technology class is G10L (Speech Analysis Techniques OR Speech SYNTHESIS; Speech RECOGNITION; Speech OR Voice Processing TECHNIQUES; Speech OR Audio Coding OR Decoding), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G10L
- Ranked #48,800 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare MLR, LLC against Mizuno Technics Corporation, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 43.2/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.