USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Mips Technologies, Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 1 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2016. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing).

RSS updates for this company

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Mips ranks #41,713 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 6 patents across 1 technology areas.

#41,713
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
13th percentile
by Innovation Score (24.0/100)
22.8
avg claims per patent
-100%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R41713 · US Corporation #41,713 · 6 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

  • GRANTS-MICRO 6 grants
  • LOWER-Q #41,713/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH MIH Water Treatment
  • CPC-NARROW G06F · 1 areas
  • INNOV-THIN 24.0/100
  • CLAIMS-DENSE 22.8 claims/avg
  • TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
  • VEL-DROP -100% vel
  • BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: MIH Water Treatment, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Mips’s 24.0 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around Mips

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows Mips's Innovation Score is 24.0/100 (13th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Mips?

Each dot is one of Mips’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Mips’s own 22.8 claims/patent is ABOVE the 14.5 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Mips vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 5.96.06.066.06.06.1 51015202530 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent MIH Water Treatment, Inc. - 6, 9MIH Water Treatme…Millrock Technology, Inc. - 6, 17Millrock Technolo…Mimetogen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. - 6, 20.83Mimetogen Pharmac…Minicare B.V. - 6, 13.67Minicare B VMiraclon Corporation - 6, 18.83MiraclonMiramar Labs, Inc. - 6, 10.17Miramar LabsMiri Systems, LLC - 6, 14.5Miri SystemsMirion Technologies, Inc. - 6, 26.17MirionMips Technologies, Inc. - 6, 22.83Mips
Mips vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Mips's grants concentrate

Mips Technologies, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 1 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (5 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2016. By volume, Mips sits between MIH Water Treatment, Inc. and Mirion Technologies, Inc..

Who files at Mips's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Mips holds 6 patents at rank #41,595, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Mips

By rank, the assignees closest to #41,595 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Mips's primary technology class.

Mips's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

24 13th percentile higher than 13% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

0123456 20152016 1
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2016

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Mips Technologies, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2015 5 83.3%
2016 1 16.7%

Which technologies does Mips Technologies, Inc. patent most?

Top 1 of 1 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

What to do with this data

Mips Technologies, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • Mips Technologies, Inc.'s lead technology class is G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G06F
  • Ranked #41,713 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare Mips Technologies, Inc. against MIH Water Treatment, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 24.0/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.