Minerva Labs Ltd.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 2 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2017–2021. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Minerva ranks #41,709 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 6 patents across 2 technology areas.
- #41,709
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 13th percentile
- by Innovation Score (24.0/100)
- 20.5
- avg claims per patent
- +0%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R41709 · Foreign Corporation #41,709 · 6 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-FLAT · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 6 grants
- LOWER-Q #41,709/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Milenco
- CPC-NARROW G06F · 2 areas
- INNOV-THIN 24.0/100
- CLAIMS-DENSE 20.5 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-FLAT +0% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Milenco Limited (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Minerva’s 24.0 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Minerva
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Minerva Labs · this assignee 24
Minerva Labs · this assignee
24 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Minerva's Innovation Score is 24.0/100 (13th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Minerva?
Each dot is one of Minerva’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Minerva’s own 20.5 claims/patent is ABOVE the 12.0 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Minerva's grants concentrate
Minerva Labs Ltd. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 2 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing). Peak complete grant year is 2019 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2017. By volume, Minerva sits between Milenco Limited and Mireplica Technology, LLC.
Who files at Minerva's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Milenco
Milenco Limited
6 patents
- Miller Nelson
Miller Nelson, LLC
6 patents
- Millikelvin
Millikelvin Technologies LLC
6 patents
- Milliman Solutions
Milliman Solutions LLC
6 patents
- Miniswys
Miniswys S.A
6 patents
- Mintech
Mintech Co., Ltd
6 patents
- Miracll Chemicals
Miracll Chemicals Co., Ltd.
6 patents
- Mireplica Technol…
Mireplica Technology, LLC
6 patents
- Minerva Labs ◀
Minerva Labs Ltd.
6 patents
What this shows Minerva holds 6 patents at rank #41,754, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Minerva
By rank, the assignees closest to #41,754 in granted patent volume.
- Milenco Limited #41,750 · 6 patents
- Miller Nelson, LLC #41,751 · 6 patents
- Millikelvin Technologies LLC #41,752 · 6 patents
- Milliman Solutions LLC #41,753 · 6 patents
- Miniswys S.A #41,755 · 6 patents
- Mintech Co., Ltd #41,756 · 6 patents
- Miracll Chemicals Co., Ltd. #41,757 · 6 patents
- Mireplica Technology, LLC #41,758 · 6 patents
Leaders in G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Minerva's primary technology class.
- International Business Machines Corporation 42,717 in class
- Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 21,497 in class
- Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC 16,951 in class
- Google LLC 13,092 in class
- Intel Corporation 12,803 in class
- Apple Inc. 11,007 in class
- Amazon Technologies, Inc. 10,217 in class
- Dell Products L.P. 7,187 in class
Minerva's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
24 13th percentile higher than 13% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2017–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2019 | 2 | 33.3% |
| 2020 | 2 | 33.3% |
| 2021 | 1 | 16.7% |
Which technologies does Minerva Labs Ltd. patent most?
Top 2 of 2 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Minerva Labs Ltd.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Minerva Labs Ltd.'s lead technology class is G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G06F
- Ranked #41,709 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Minerva Labs Ltd. against Milenco Limited, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 24.0/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.