Mine ONE GmbH
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 13 granted patents across 5 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2020–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H04N (Pictorial Communication, e.g. Television).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Mine ranks #21,455 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 13 patents across 5 technology areas.
- #21,455
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- Top 32%
- by Innovation Score (41.8/100)
- 19.0
- avg claims per patent
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R21455 · Foreign Corporation #21,455 · 13 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · SPAN-YRS · BOOK-RICH
- GRANTS-MICRO 13 grants
- MID-PACK #21,455/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Microflor
- CPC-NARROW H04N · 5 areas
- INNOV-PAR 41.8/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 19.0 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- SPAN-YRS 2020–2025 · 6y
- BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Microflor N.V. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Mine’s 41.8 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Mine
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Mine ONE · this assignee
Mine ONE · this assignee
42 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Mine's Innovation Score is 41.8/100 (top 32% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Mine?
Each dot is one of Mine’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Mine’s own 19.0 claims/patent is ABOVE the 9.1 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Mine's grants concentrate
Mine ONE GmbH is a focused PatentsView assignee: 5 CPC subclasses with 76.9% of grants classified under H04N (Pictorial Communication, e.g. Television). Peak complete grant year is 2023 (3 grants) versus a trough of 2 in 2020. By volume, Mine sits between Microflor N.V. and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Marine Machinery & Equipment Co., Ltd..
Mine's three-year grant acceleration
Mine ONE GmbH shows 8 grants in 2022–2024 against only 4 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at Mine's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Microflor
Microflor N.V.
13 patents
- Microfluidics Int…
Microfluidics International Corporation
13 patents
- Microtransponder
Microtransponder, Inc.
13 patents
- MIM Software
MIM Software Inc.
13 patents
- Misumi
Misumi Corporation
13 patents
- Mitotech
Mitotech S.A.
13 patents
- Mitraltech
Mitraltech Ltd.
13 patents
- Mitsubishi Heavy…
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Marine Machinery & Equipment Co., Ltd.
13 patents
- Mine ONE ◀
Mine ONE GmbH
13 patents
What this shows Mine holds 13 patents at rank #21,424, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Mine
By rank, the assignees closest to #21,424 in granted patent volume.
- Microflor N.V. #21,420 · 13 patents
- Microfluidics International Corporation #21,421 · 13 patents
- Microtransponder, Inc. #21,422 · 13 patents
- MIM Software Inc. #21,423 · 13 patents
- Misumi Corporation #21,425 · 13 patents
- Mitotech S.A. #21,426 · 13 patents
- Mitraltech Ltd. #21,427 · 13 patents
- Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Marine Machinery & Equipment Co., Ltd. #21,428 · 13 patents
Leaders in H04N (Pictorial Communication)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Mine's primary technology class.
Mine's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
42 Top 32% higher than 68% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2020–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 2 | 15.4% |
| 2021 | 2 | 15.4% |
| 2022 | 2 | 15.4% |
| 2023 | 3 | 23.1% |
| 2024 | 3 | 23.1% |
| 2025partial year | 1 | 7.7% |
Which technologies does Mine ONE GmbH patent most?
Top 5 of 5 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Mine ONE GmbH's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Mine ONE GmbH's lead technology class is H04N (Pictorial Communication, e.g. Television), 76.9% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H04N
- Ranked #21,455 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Mine ONE GmbH against Microflor N.V., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 41.8/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.