MIN AIK Technology Co., Ltd.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 7 granted patents across 7 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2020. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G02B (Optical Elements, Systems OR Apparatus).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, MIN ranks #36,501 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 7 patents across 7 technology areas.
- #36,501
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 17th percentile
- by Innovation Score (25.3/100)
- 14.6
- avg claims per patent
- -60%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R36501 · Foreign Corporation #36,501 · 7 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 7 grants
- MID-PACK #36,501/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Millenium Synthfuels
- CPC-NARROW G02B · 7 areas
- INNOV-THIN 25.3/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 14.6 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-DROP -60% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Millenium Synthfuels Corporation (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How MIN’s 25.3 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around MIN
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- MIN AIK Technology · this assignee 25
MIN AIK Technology · this assignee
25 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows MIN's Innovation Score is 25.3/100 (17th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for MIN?
Each dot is one of MIN’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). MIN’s own 14.6 claims/patent is ABOVE the 13.1 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where MIN's grants concentrate
MIN AIK Technology Co., Ltd. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 7 CPC subclasses with 57.1% of grants classified under G02B (Optical Elements, Systems OR Apparatus). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2019. By volume, MIN sits between Millenium Synthfuels Corporation and Minute KEY Inc..
Who files at MIN's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Millenium Synthfu…
Millenium Synthfuels Corporation
7 patents
- Millet Innovation
Millet Innovation
7 patents
- Milner Sports
Milner Sports, LLC
7 patents
- Milspray
Milspray LLC
7 patents
- Minigraphics
Minigraphics, Inc.
7 patents
- Minova Internatio…
Minova International Limited
7 patents
- Mintek
Mintek
7 patents
- Minute KEY
Minute KEY Inc.
7 patents
- MIN AIK Technology ◀
MIN AIK Technology Co., Ltd.
7 patents
What this shows MIN holds 7 patents at rank #36,396, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near MIN
By rank, the assignees closest to #36,396 in granted patent volume.
- Millenium Synthfuels Corporation #36,392 · 7 patents
- Millet Innovation #36,393 · 7 patents
- Milner Sports, LLC #36,394 · 7 patents
- Milspray LLC #36,395 · 7 patents
- Minigraphics, Inc. #36,397 · 7 patents
- Minova International Limited #36,398 · 7 patents
- Mintek #36,399 · 7 patents
- Minute KEY Inc. #36,400 · 7 patents
Leaders in G02B (Optical Elements)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in MIN's primary technology class.
- Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 4,608 in class
- Canon Kabushiki Kaisha 2,525 in class
- Fujifilm Corporation 2,173 in class
- BOE Technology Group Co., Ltd. 1,899 in class
- Olympus Corporation 1,893 in class
- Sony Group Corporation 1,572 in class
- Apple Inc. 1,367 in class
- Seiko Epson Corporation 1,332 in class
MIN's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
25 17th percentile higher than 17% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 2 | 28.6% |
| 2018 | 2 | 28.6% |
| 2019 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2020 | 2 | 28.6% |
Which technologies does MIN AIK Technology Co., Ltd. patent most?
Top 7 of 7 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
MIN AIK Technology Co., Ltd.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- MIN AIK Technology Co., Ltd.'s lead technology class is G02B (Optical Elements, Systems OR Apparatus), 57.1% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G02B
- Ranked #36,501 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare MIN AIK Technology Co., Ltd. against Millenium Synthfuels Corporation, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 25.3/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.