PlainPatent
USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Microsoft Mobile Oy

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 42 granted patents across 0 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2017. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength.

RSS updates for this company
Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Microsoft ranks #7,737 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 42 patents across 0 technology areas.

#7,737
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
2nd percentile
by Innovation Score (13.6/100)
1.0
avg claims per patent
-100%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R7737 · Foreign Corporation #7,737 · 42 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-UNK · INNOV-LOW · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-RICH

  • GRANTS-SMALL 42 grants
  • UPPER-Q #7,737/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Linxens Holding
  • CPC-UNK CPC blank
  • INNOV-LOW 13.6/100
  • CLAIMS-SPARSE 1.0 claims/avg
  • TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
  • VEL-DROP -100% vel
  • BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Linxens Holding (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Microsoft’s 13.6 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around Microsoft

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows Microsoft's Innovation Score is 13.6/100 (2nd percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Microsoft?

Each dot is one of Microsoft’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Microsoft’s own 1.0 claims/patent is at or below the 16.9 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Microsoft vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 41.942.042.04242.042.042.1 0510152025 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Linxens Holding - 42, 16.9Linxens HoldingMaxwell Technologies, Inc. - 42, 19.48MaxwellMelnor Inc. - 42, 2.67MelnorMerus N.V. - 42, 18.45MerusModne, Inc. - 42, 1ModneMorinaga Milk Industry Co., Ltd. - 42, 8.24Morinaga Milk Ind…Mozarc Medical US LLC - 42, 17.74Mozarc Medical USNanthealth, Inc. - 42, 21.19NanthealthMicrosoft Mobile Oy - 42, 1Microsoft Mobile…
Microsoft vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Microsoft's grants concentrate

Microsoft Mobile Oy is a focused PatentsView assignee: 0 CPC subclasses . Peak complete grant year is 2016 (33 grants) versus a trough of 4 in 2017. By volume, Microsoft sits between Linxens Holding and Nanthealth, Inc..

Who files at Microsoft's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Microsoft holds 42 patents at rank #7,737, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Microsoft

By rank, the assignees closest to #7,737 in granted patent volume.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Microsoft, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above).

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (14 here).

Modne, Inc. 14 Rtic Outdoors, LLC 14 Saverglass 14 Figueras Seating Solutions, S.L. 14

Microsoft's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

14 2nd percentile higher than 2% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

010203040 201520162017 4
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2017

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Microsoft Mobile Oy patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2015 5 11.9%
2016 33 78.6%
2017 4 9.5%

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Microsoft Mobile Oy's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • Ranked #7,737 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare Microsoft Mobile Oy against Linxens Holding, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 13.6/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page
  • USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
  • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
  • USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.