Where does Michigan Vehicle Solutions rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Michigan Vehicle Solutions ranks #20,080 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Michigan Vehicle Solutions hold?

Michigan Vehicle Solutions holds 14 US utility patents granted between 2016 and 2021, spanning 3 technology areas.

What is Michigan Vehicle Solutions's Innovation Score?

Michigan Vehicle Solutions has an Innovation Score of 17.1 out of 100 (4th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

Is Michigan Vehicle Solutions's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Michigan Vehicle Solutions's recent grant velocity is -25% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for Michigan Vehicle Solutions's patents?

Michigan Vehicle Solutions's patents average 2.6 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Michigan Vehicle Solutions patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Michigan Vehicle Solutions

Q: What technology areas does Michigan Vehicle Solutions focus on?

Michigan Vehicle Solutions's top technology area is B60J (Windows, Windscreens, Non-fixed Roofs, Doors, OR Similar Devices FOR VEHICLES; Removable External Protective Coverings Specially Adapted FOR Vehicles) with 1 patents, ranking #277 of 418 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 3 CPC subclasses total.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 14 granted patents across 3 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2021. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B60J (Windows, Windscreens, Non-fixed Roofs, Doors, OR Similar Devices FOR VEHICLES; Removable External Protective Coverings Specially Adapted FOR Vehicles).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Michigan ranks #20,080 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 14 patents across 3 technology areas.

#20,080
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 4th percentile
by Innovation Score (17.1/100): 2.6
avg claims per patent: -25%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R20080 · US Corporation #20,080 · 14 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-LOW · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DOWN · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 14 grants
MID-PACK #20,080/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Metrospec Technology…
CPC-NARROW B60J · 3 areas
INNOV-LOW 17.1/100
CLAIMS-SPARSE 2.6 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-DOWN -25% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Metrospec Technology, L.L.C. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Michigan’s 17.1 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 9.4 pts (55%) Velocity 0.0 pts (0%) Breadth 6.1 pts (36%) Claim depth 1.6 pts (9%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Michigan Vehicle… · this assignee

17
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Michigan's Innovation Score is 17.1/100 (4th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Michigan?

Each dot is one of Michigan’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Michigan’s own 2.6 claims/patent is at or below the 18.8 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Michigan vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Michigan's grants concentrate

Michigan Vehicle Solutions is a focused PatentsView assignee: 3 CPC subclasses with 7.1% of grants classified under B60J (Windows, Windscreens, Non-fixed Roofs, Doors, OR Similar Devices FOR VEHICLES; Removable External Protective Coverings Specially Adapted FOR Vehicles). Peak complete grant year is 2018 (6 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2016. By volume, Michigan sits between Metrospec Technology, L.L.C. and Midwwest Energy Emissions Corp..

Metrospec Technol…

14
Meyer Products

14
Mina Therapeutics

14
Michelman

14
Micrel Medical De…

14
Microfilter

14
Microline Surgical

14
Midwwest Energy E…

14
Michigan Vehicle… ◀

14

What this shows Michigan holds 14 patents at rank #20,098, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Michigan

By rank, the assignees closest to #20,098 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in B60J (Windows)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Michigan's primary technology class.

Michigan's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

17 4th percentile higher than 4% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2016–2021

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Michigan Vehicle Solutions patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2016	1	7.1%
2018	6	42.9%
2019	1	7.1%
2020	3	21.4%
2021	3	21.4%

Which technologies does Michigan Vehicle Solutions patent most?

B60J - Windows, Windscreens, Non-fixed Roofs, Doors, OR Similar Devices FOR VEHICLES; Removable External Protective Coverings Specially Adapted FOR Vehicles 1

E05Y - Indexing Scheme Associated With Subclasses E05d AND E05f, Relating TO Construction Elements, Electric Control, Power Supply, Power Signal OR Transmission, User Interfaces, Mounting OR Coupling, Details, Accessories, Auxiliary Operations NOT Otherwise Provided FOR, Application Thereof 1

E05D - Hinges OR Suspension Devices FOR Doors, Windows OR Wings 1

Top 3 of 3 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Michigan Vehicle Solutions's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Michigan Vehicle Solutions's lead technology class is B60J (Windows, Windscreens, Non-fixed Roofs, Doors, OR Similar Devices FOR VEHICLES; Removable External Protective Coverings Specially Adapted FOR Vehicles), 7.1% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore B60J
Ranked #20,080 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Michigan Vehicle Solutions against Metrospec Technology, L.L.C., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 17.1/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.