Where does MCM Global AG rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), MCM Global AG ranks #16,981 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does MCM Global AG hold?

MCM Global AG holds 17 US utility patents granted between 2023 and 2025, spanning 0 technology areas.

What is MCM Global AG's Innovation Score?

MCM Global AG has an Innovation Score of 30.6 out of 100 (35th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does MCM Global AG focus on?

MCM Global AG holds grants across 0 technology areas classified under the Cooperative Patent Classification system.

Is MCM Global AG's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Insufficient historical data is available to calculate a velocity trend for MCM Global AG.

What does claim depth mean for MCM Global AG's patents?

MCM Global AG's patents average 1.0 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the MCM Global AG patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

MCM Global AG

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 17 granted patents across 0 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2023–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength.

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, MCM ranks #16,981 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 17 patents across 0 technology areas.

#16,981
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 35th percentile
by Innovation Score (30.6/100): 1.0
avg claims per patent

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R16981 · Foreign Corporation #16,981 · 17 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-UNK · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · SPAN-YRS · BOOK-RICH

GRANTS-MICRO 17 grants
MID-PACK #16,981/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Madi
CPC-UNK CPC blank
INNOV-THIN 30.6/100
CLAIMS-SPARSE 1.0 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
SPAN-YRS 2023–2025 · 3y
BOOK-RICH 8/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Madi, LLC (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How MCM’s 30.6 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 10.0 pts (33%) Velocity 20.0 pts (65%) Breadth 0.0 pts (0%) Claim depth 0.6 pts (2%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
MCM Global · this assignee

31
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows MCM's Innovation Score is 30.6/100 (35th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for MCM?

Each dot is one of MCM’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). MCM’s own 1.0 claims/patent is at or below the 13.9 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

MCM vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where MCM's grants concentrate

MCM Global AG is a focused PatentsView assignee: 0 CPC subclasses . By volume, MCM sits between Madi, LLC and Metrotech Corporation.

MCM's three-year grant acceleration

MCM Global AG shows 10 grants in 2022–2024 against only 0 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Madi

17
Marelli Automotiv…

17
MAX Interactive

17
Maxon Motor

17
Medimaging Integr…

17
Metacluster LT UAB

17
Metisx

17
Metrotech

17
MCM Global ◀

17

What this shows MCM holds 17 patents at rank #16,975, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near MCM

By rank, the assignees closest to #16,975 in granted patent volume.

MCM's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

31 35th percentile higher than 35% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2023–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2023–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

MCM Global AG patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2023	5	29.4%
2024	5	29.4%
2025partial year	7	41.2%

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

MCM Global AG's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Ranked #16,981 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare MCM Global AG against Madi, LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 30.6/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.