Maxine M. Thompson Trust
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 11 granted patents across 0 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2018. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength.
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Maxine ranks #24,769 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 11 patents across 0 technology areas.
- #24,769
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 1st percentile
- by Innovation Score (9.2/100)
- 1.0
- avg claims per patent
- -100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R24769 · US Corporation #24,769 · 11 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-UNK · INNOV-LOW · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-RICH
- GRANTS-MICRO 11 grants
- MID-PACK #24,769/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Maruzen
- CPC-UNK CPC blank
- INNOV-LOW 9.2/100
- CLAIMS-SPARSE 1.0 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -100% vel
- BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Maruzen Company Limited (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Maxine’s 9.2 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Maxine
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Maxine M Thompson… · this assignee 9
Maxine M Thompson… · this assignee
9 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Maxine's Innovation Score is 9.2/100 (1st percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Maxine?
Each dot is one of Maxine’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Maxine’s own 1.0 claims/patent is at or below the 14.4 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Maxine's grants concentrate
Maxine M. Thompson Trust is a focused PatentsView assignee: 0 CPC subclasses . Peak complete grant year is 2017 (5 grants) versus a trough of 2 in 2018. By volume, Maxine sits between Maruzen Company Limited and MCE 5 Development.
Who files at Maxine's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Maruzen
Maruzen Company Limited
11 patents
- Masarykova Univer…
Masarykova Univerzita
11 patents
- Massachusetts Gen…
Massachusetts General Hospital
11 patents
- Mattur Holdings
Mattur Holdings, Inc.
11 patents
- Mayfonk Athletic
Mayfonk Athletic, LLC
11 patents
- Mbrico
Mbrico, LLC
11 patents
- Mcci
Mcci Corporation
11 patents
- MCE 5 Development
MCE 5 Development
11 patents
- Maxine M Thompson… ◀
Maxine M. Thompson Trust
11 patents
What this shows Maxine holds 11 patents at rank #24,735, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Maxine
By rank, the assignees closest to #24,735 in granted patent volume.
- Maruzen Company Limited #24,731 · 11 patents
- Masarykova Univerzita #24,732 · 11 patents
- Massachusetts General Hospital #24,733 · 11 patents
- Mattur Holdings, Inc. #24,734 · 11 patents
- Mayfonk Athletic, LLC #24,736 · 11 patents
- Mbrico, LLC #24,737 · 11 patents
- Mcci Corporation #24,738 · 11 patents
- MCE 5 Development #24,739 · 11 patents
Maxine's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
9 1st percentile higher than 1% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 4 | 36.4% |
| 2017 | 5 | 45.5% |
| 2018 | 2 | 18.2% |
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Maxine M. Thompson Trust's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Ranked #24,769 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Maxine M. Thompson Trust against Maruzen Company Limited, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 9.2/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.