Where does Matrixx Software, Inc. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Matrixx Software, Inc. ranks #17,880 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Matrixx Software, Inc. hold?

Matrixx Software, Inc. holds 16 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2024, spanning 7 technology areas.

What is Matrixx Software, Inc.'s Innovation Score?

Matrixx Software, Inc. has an Innovation Score of 35.4 out of 100 (top 49% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Matrixx Software, Inc. focus on?

Matrixx Software, Inc.'s top technology area is G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing) with 13 patents, ranking #2,953 of 13,878 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 7 CPC subclasses total.

Is Matrixx Software, Inc.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Matrixx Software, Inc.'s recent grant velocity is -67% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for Matrixx Software, Inc.'s patents?

Matrixx Software, Inc.'s patents average 19.8 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Matrixx Software, Inc. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Matrixx Software, Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 16 granted patents across 7 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Matrixx ranks #17,880 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 16 patents across 7 technology areas.

#17,880
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 49%
by Innovation Score (35.4/100): 19.8
avg claims per patent: -67%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R17880 · US Corporation #17,880 · 16 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 16 grants
MID-PACK #17,880/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Macorva
CPC-NARROW G06F · 7 areas
INNOV-THIN 35.4/100
CLAIMS-RICH 19.8 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-DROP -67% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Macorva Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Matrixx’s 35.4 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 9.8 pts (28%) Velocity 4.4 pts (12%) Breadth 9.4 pts (26%) Claim depth 11.9 pts (34%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Matrixx Software · this assignee

35
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Matrixx's Innovation Score is 35.4/100 (top 49% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Matrixx?

Each dot is one of Matrixx’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Matrixx’s own 19.8 claims/patent is ABOVE the 12.5 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Matrixx vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Matrixx's grants concentrate

Matrixx Software, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 7 CPC subclasses with 81.3% of grants classified under G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (4 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, Matrixx sits between Macorva Inc. and McNeil AB.

Matrixx's three-year grant acceleration

Matrixx Software, Inc. shows 2 grants in 2022–2024 against only 3 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Macorva

16
Mad Dogg Athletics

16
Maintek Computer…

16
Masco Canada

16
Matthews Resources

16
Maxim Defense Ind…

16
Mcgill University

16
Mcneil AB

16
Matrixx Software ◀

16

What this shows Matrixx holds 16 patents at rank #17,898, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Matrixx

By rank, the assignees closest to #17,898 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Matrixx's primary technology class.

Matrixx's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

35 Top 49% higher than 51% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2024

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Matrixx Software, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	1	6.3%
2016	4	25.0%
2017	4	25.0%
2018	2	12.5%
2019	1	6.3%
2020	1	6.3%
2021	1	6.3%
2022	1	6.3%
2024	1	6.3%

Which technologies does Matrixx Software, Inc. patent most?

G06F - Electric Digital Data Processing 13

H04L - Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication 8

H04W - Wireless Communication Networks 5

G06Q - Information AND Communication Technology [ICT] Specially Adapted FOR Administrative, Commercial, Financial, Managerial OR Supervisory PURPOSES; Systems OR Methods Specially Adapted FOR Administrative, Commercial, Financial, Managerial OR Supervisory Purposes, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 5

H04M - Telephonic Communication 3

Y02D - Climate Change Mitigation Technologies IN Information AND Communication Technologies [ICT], I.E. Information AND Communication Technologies Aiming AT THE Reduction OF Their OWN Energy USE 2

H04B - Transmission 2

Top 7 of 7 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Matrixx Software, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Matrixx Software, Inc.'s lead technology class is G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing), 81.3% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G06F
Ranked #17,880 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Matrixx Software, Inc. against Macorva Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 35.4/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.