USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Mastrad, S.A.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 21 granted patents across 9 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2018. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A47J (Kitchen EQUIPMENT; Coffee MILLS; Spice MILLS; Apparatus FOR Making Beverages).

RSS updates for this company

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Mastrad ranks #14,130 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 21 patents across 9 technology areas.

#14,130
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
16th percentile
by Innovation Score (24.9/100)
6.0
avg claims per patent
-100%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R14130 · Foreign Corporation #14,130 · 21 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

  • GRANTS-SMALL 21 grants
  • MID-PACK #14,130/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH LumiraDx UK
  • CPC-NARROW A47J · 9 areas
  • INNOV-THIN 24.9/100
  • CLAIMS-SPARSE 6.0 claims/avg
  • TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
  • VEL-DROP -100% vel
  • BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: LumiraDx UK Ltd. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Mastrad’s 24.9 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around Mastrad

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows Mastrad's Innovation Score is 24.9/100 (16th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Mastrad?

Each dot is one of Mastrad’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Mastrad’s own 6.0 claims/patent is at or below the 10.5 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Mastrad vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 20.920.92121.1 510152025 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent LumiraDx UK Ltd. - 21, 16.95Lumiradx UKLynq Technologies, Inc. - 21, 18.19LynqMagna Energy Storage Systems GesmbH - 21, 15.76Magna Energy Stor…MAM Babyartikel Gesellschaft M.B.H. - 21, 7.76MAM Babyartikel G…Maxon Industries, Inc. - 21, 20.67Maxon IndustriesMetromax America Corporation - 21, 8.81Metromax AmericaMilestone Scientific, Inc. - 21, 10.48Milestone Scienti…Mitsubishi Cable Industries, Ltd. - 21, 7.86Mitsubishi Cable…Mastrad, S.A. - 21, 5.95Mastrad
Mastrad vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Mastrad's grants concentrate

Mastrad, S.A. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 9 CPC subclasses with 28.6% of grants classified under A47J (Kitchen EQUIPMENT; Coffee MILLS; Spice MILLS; Apparatus FOR Making Beverages). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (9 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2018. By volume, Mastrad sits between LumiraDx UK Ltd. and Mitsubishi Cable Industries, Ltd..

Who files at Mastrad's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Mastrad holds 21 patents at rank #14,123, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Mastrad

By rank, the assignees closest to #14,123 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in A47J (Kitchen Equipment)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Mastrad's primary technology class.

Mastrad's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

25 16th percentile higher than 16% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

0246810 2015201620172018 1
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2018

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Mastrad, S.A. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2015 7 33.3%
2016 9 42.9%
2017 4 19.0%
2018 1 4.8%

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

What to do with this data

Mastrad, S.A.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • Mastrad, S.A.'s lead technology class is A47J (Kitchen EQUIPMENT; Coffee MILLS; Spice MILLS; Apparatus FOR Making Beverages), 28.6% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A47J
  • Ranked #14,130 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare Mastrad, S.A. against LumiraDx UK Ltd., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 24.9/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.