Where does Martor KG rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Martor KG ranks #9,553 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Martor KG hold?

Martor KG holds 33 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2024, spanning 3 technology areas.

What is Martor KG's Innovation Score?

Martor KG has an Innovation Score of 25.4 out of 100 (17th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Martor KG focus on?

Martor KG's top technology area is B26B (Hand-held Cutting Tools NOT Otherwise Provided FOR) with 20 patents, ranking #17 of 239 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 3 CPC subclasses total.

Is Martor KG's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Martor KG's recent grant velocity is -50% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for Martor KG's patents?

Martor KG's patents average 7.2 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Martor KG patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Martor KG

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 33 granted patents across 3 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B26B (Hand-held Cutting Tools NOT Otherwise Provided FOR).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Martor ranks #9,553 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 33 patents across 3 technology areas.

#9,553
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 17th percentile
by Innovation Score (25.4/100): 7.2
avg claims per patent: -50%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R9553 · Foreign Corporation #9,553 · 33 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-SMALL 33 grants
UPPER-Q #9,553/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH MA Lighting Technology
CPC-NARROW B26B · 3 areas
INNOV-THIN 25.4/100
CLAIMS-SPARSE 7.2 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
VEL-DROP -50% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: MA Lighting Technology GMBH (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Martor’s 25.4 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 12.2 pts (48%) Velocity 2.8 pts (11%) Breadth 6.1 pts (24%) Claim depth 4.3 pts (17%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Teenage Engineering AB · near

25
Ye Xin Technology… · near

25
Comitt Well Solutions · near

25
Martor KG · this assignee

25
Rsupport · near

25
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Martor's Innovation Score is 25.4/100 (17th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Martor?

Each dot is one of Martor’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Martor’s own 7.2 claims/patent is at or below the 10.2 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Martor vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Martor's grants concentrate

Martor KG is a focused PatentsView assignee: 3 CPC subclasses with 60.6% of grants classified under B26B (Hand-held Cutting Tools NOT Otherwise Provided FOR). Peak complete grant year is 2018 (7 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2024. By volume, Martor sits between MA Lighting Technology GMBH and Modumetal, Inc..

Martor's three-year grant acceleration

Martor KG shows 5 grants in 2022–2024 against only 12 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

MA Lighting Techn…

33
Malzine

33
Mapa

33
Marel Stork Poult…

33
Medartis

33
Metawater

33
Modular Mining Sy…

33
Modumetal

33
Martor KG ◀

33

What this shows Martor holds 33 patents at rank #9,551, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Martor

By rank, the assignees closest to #9,551 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in B26B (Hand-held Cutting Tools)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Martor's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Martor, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In B26B (Hand-held Cutting Tools), Martor ranks #17 of 239 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (25 here).

Comitt Well Solutions LLC 25 Rsupport Co., Ltd. 25 Teenage Engineering AB 25 Ye Xin Technology Consulting Co., Ltd. 25

Martor's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

25 17th percentile higher than 17% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2024

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Martor KG patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	3	9.1%
2016	4	12.1%
2017	2	6.1%
2018	7	21.2%
2019	6	18.2%
2020	2	6.1%
2021	4	12.1%
2022	2	6.1%
2023	2	6.1%
2024	1	3.0%

Which technologies does Martor KG patent most?

B26B - Hand-held Cutting Tools NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 20

B65D - Containers FOR Storage OR Transport OF Articles OR Materials, e.g. Bags, Barrels, Bottles, Boxes, Cans, Cartons, Crates, Drums, Jars, Tanks, Hoppers, Forwarding CONTAINERS; Accessories, Closures, OR Fittings THEREFOR; Packaging ELEMENTS; Packages 2

Y10T - Technical Subjects Covered BY Former US Classification 1

Top 3 of 3 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Martor KG's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Martor KG's lead technology class is B26B (Hand-held Cutting Tools NOT Otherwise Provided FOR), 60.6% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore B26B
Ranked #9,553 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Martor KG against MA Lighting Technology GMBH, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 25.4/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.