USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Mark & Draw Co., Ltd

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 3 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2022. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H04M (Telephonic Communication).

RSS updates for this company

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Mark ranks #41,573 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 6 patents across 3 technology areas.

#41,573
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
9th percentile
by Innovation Score (21.8/100)
9.3
avg claims per patent
+0%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R41573 · Foreign Corporation #41,573 · 6 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-PAR · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-FLAT · BOOK-FULL

  • GRANTS-MICRO 6 grants
  • LOWER-Q #41,573/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH MAPED
  • CPC-NARROW H04M · 3 areas
  • INNOV-THIN 21.8/100
  • CLAIMS-PAR 9.3 claims/avg
  • TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
  • VEL-FLAT +0% vel
  • BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: MAPED (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Mark’s 21.8 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around Mark

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows Mark's Innovation Score is 21.8/100 (9th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Mark?

Each dot is one of Mark’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Mark’s own 9.3 claims/patent is at or below the 11.7 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Mark vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 5.96.06.066.06.06.1 0510152025 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent MAPED - 6, 2.67MapedMaradin Technologies Ltd. - 6, 18.5MaradinMarel, Inc. - 6, 13.33MarelMarine Biomedical Research Institute OF Qingdao Co., Ltd. - 6, 11.67Marine Biomedical…Marlin Steel Wire Products, LLC - 6, 11.17Marlin Steel Wire…Maschinenfabrik Alfing Kessler GMBH - 6, 12.5Maschinenfabrik A…Mascot Electric Co., Ltd. - 6, 7.17Mascot ElectricMashable, Inc. - 6, 19.67MashableMark & Draw Co., Ltd - 6, 9.33Mark & Draw
Mark vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Mark's grants concentrate

Mark & Draw Co., Ltd is a focused PatentsView assignee: 3 CPC subclasses with 33.3% of grants classified under H04M (Telephonic Communication). By volume, Mark sits between MAPED and Mashable, Inc..

Mark's three-year grant acceleration

Mark & Draw Co., Ltd shows 1 grants in 2022–2024 against only 2 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Who files at Mark's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Mark holds 6 patents at rank #41,521, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Mark

By rank, the assignees closest to #41,521 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in H04M (Telephonic Communication)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Mark's primary technology class.

Mark's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

22 9th percentile higher than 9% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

1 201620172018202020212022 1
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2016–2022

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Mark & Draw Co., Ltd patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2016 1 16.7%
2017 1 16.7%
2018 1 16.7%
2020 1 16.7%
2021 1 16.7%
2022 1 16.7%

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

What to do with this data

Mark & Draw Co., Ltd's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • Mark & Draw Co., Ltd's lead technology class is H04M (Telephonic Communication), 33.3% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H04M
  • Ranked #41,573 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare Mark & Draw Co., Ltd against MAPED, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 21.8/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.