Mango Leaf and Company Inc.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 1 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2015. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A47J (Kitchen EQUIPMENT; Coffee MILLS; Spice MILLS; Apparatus FOR Making Beverages).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Mango ranks #48,544 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 5 patents across 1 technology areas.
- #48,544
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 2nd percentile
- by Innovation Score (12.6/100)
- 4.8
- avg claims per patent
- -100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R48544 · US Corporation #48,544 · 5 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · BOTTOM-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-LOW · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 5 grants
- BOTTOM-DECILE #48,544/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Mahle Donghyun…
- CPC-NARROW A47J · 1 areas
- INNOV-LOW 12.6/100
- CLAIMS-SPARSE 4.8 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -100% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Mahle Donghyun Filter Systems Co., Ltd. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Mango’s 12.6 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Mango
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Mango Leaf and · this assignee 13
Mango Leaf and · this assignee
13 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Mango's Innovation Score is 12.6/100 (2nd percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Mango?
Each dot is one of Mango’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Mango’s own 4.8 claims/patent is at or below the 17.4 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Mango's grants concentrate
Mango Leaf and Company Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 1 CPC subclasses with 20% of grants classified under A47J (Kitchen EQUIPMENT; Coffee MILLS; Spice MILLS; Apparatus FOR Making Beverages). By volume, Mango sits between Mahle Donghyun Filter Systems Co., Ltd. and Mantissa Corporation.
Who files at Mango's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Mahle Donghyun Fi…
Mahle Donghyun Filter Systems Co., Ltd.
5 patents
- Main St Group
Main St. Group
5 patents
- Majestic-12
Majestic-12 Ltd
5 patents
- Mammoth Bioscienc…
Mammoth Biosciences, Inc.
5 patents
- Mangstor
Mangstor, Inc.
5 patents
- Mantech Advanced…
Mantech Advanced Systems International, Inc.
5 patents
- Mantis Product De…
Mantis Product Development Corporation
5 patents
- Mantissa
Mantissa Corporation
5 patents
- Mango Leaf and ◀
Mango Leaf and Company Inc.
5 patents
What this shows Mango holds 5 patents at rank #48,754, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Mango
By rank, the assignees closest to #48,754 in granted patent volume.
- Mahle Donghyun Filter Systems Co., Ltd. #48,750 · 5 patents
- Main St. Group #48,751 · 5 patents
- Majestic-12 Ltd #48,752 · 5 patents
- Mammoth Biosciences, Inc. #48,753 · 5 patents
- Mangstor, Inc. #48,755 · 5 patents
- Mantech Advanced Systems International, Inc. #48,756 · 5 patents
- Mantis Product Development Corporation #48,757 · 5 patents
- Mantissa Corporation #48,758 · 5 patents
Leaders in A47J (Kitchen Equipment)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Mango's primary technology class.
Mango's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
13 2nd percentile higher than 2% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 5 | 100.0% |
Which technologies does Mango Leaf and Company Inc. patent most?
Top 1 of 1 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Mango Leaf and Company Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Mango Leaf and Company Inc.'s lead technology class is A47J (Kitchen EQUIPMENT; Coffee MILLS; Spice MILLS; Apparatus FOR Making Beverages), 20% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A47J
- Ranked #48,544 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Mango Leaf and Company Inc. against Mahle Donghyun Filter Systems Co., Ltd., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 12.6/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.